search for: nv50_sor_enable

...sor_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, + struct drm_atomic_state *state) { struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder); struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(nv_encoder->crtc); @@ -1601,7 +1653,8 @@ nv50_sor_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) } static void -nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) +nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, + struct drm_atomic_state *state) { struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder); struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(encoder->crtc); @@ -1625,7 +1678,7 @@ nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder...

..._funcs nv50_msto_help = { - .disable = nv50_msto_disable, - .enable = nv50_msto_enable, + .atomic_disable = nv50_msto_disable, + .atomic_enable = nv50_msto_enable, .atomic_check = nv50_msto_atomic_check, }; @@ -1645,8 +1645,7 @@ nv50_sor_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, } static void -nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, - struct drm_atomic_state *state) +nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state) { struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder); struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(encoder->crtc); @@ -1873,7 +1872,7 @@ nv...

..._atomic_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state) { struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder); struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(nv_encoder->crtc); @@ -1642,7 +1641,7 @@ nv50_sor_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, } static void -nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state) +nv50_sor_atomic_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state) { struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder); struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(encoder->crtc); @@ -1747,8 +1746,8 @...

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

...0x6; break; - } - - mstm->outp->update(mstm->outp, head->base.index, armh, proto, depth); + mstm->outp->update(mstm->outp, head->base.index, armh, proto, + nv50_dp_bpc_to_depth(armh->or.bpc)); msto->head = head; msto->mstc = mstc; @@ -1502,20 +1517,14 @@ nv50_sor_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) lvds.lvds.script |= 0x0200; } - if (nv_connector->base.display_info.bpc == 8) + if (asyh->or.bpc == 8) lvds.lvds.script |= 0x0200; } nvif_mthd(&disp->disp->object, 0, &lvds, sizeof(lvds)); break; case DCB_OUTPUT_DP:...

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

Realized when I moved nouveau over to using the atomic DP MST VCPI helpers that I forgot to ensure that we clamp the BPC to 8 to make us less likely to run out of bandwidth on a topology when enabling multiple displays that support >8 BPC - something we want to do until we have support for dynamically selecting the bpc based on the topology's available bandwidth, since userspace isn't

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM