search for: nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finish

...tate *state) struct nv50_head_atom *asyh = nv50_head_atom(new_crtc_state); struct nv50_crc *crc = &head->crc; struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx = &crc->ctx[crc->ctx_idx]; - int i; - if (asyh->clr.crc && asyh->crc.src) { - if (crc->ctx_changed) { - nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finished(head, func, ctx); - ctx = &crc->ctx[crc->ctx_idx ^ 1]; - } - nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finished(head, func, ctx); - } + if (!asyh->clr.crc) + continue; - if (asyh->set.crc) { - crc->entry_idx = 0; - crc->ctx_changed = false; - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(crc-&g...

...} + + nv50_crc_get_entries(head, func, crc->src); + + if (need_reschedule) + drm_vblank_work_schedule(&crc->flip_work, + drm_crtc_vblank_count(crtc) + + crc->flip_threshold + - crc->entry_idx, + true); + +out: + spin_unlock(&crc->lock); +} + +static void nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finished(struct nv50_head *head, + const struct nv50_crc_func *func, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = head->base.base.dev; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev); + s64 ret; + + ret = nvif_msec(&drm->client.device, 50, + if (func->...

...} + + nv50_crc_get_entries(head, func, crc->src); + + if (need_reschedule) + drm_vblank_work_schedule(&crc->flip_work, + drm_crtc_vblank_count(crtc) + + crc->flip_threshold + - crc->entry_idx, + true); + +out: + spin_unlock(&crc->lock); +} + +static void nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finished(struct nv50_head *head, + const struct nv50_crc_func *func, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = head->base.base.dev; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev); + s64 ret; + + ret = nvif_msec(&drm->client.device, 50, + if (func->...

...} + + nv50_crc_get_entries(head, func, crc->src); + + if (need_reschedule) + drm_vblank_work_schedule(&crc->flip_work, + drm_crtc_vblank_count(crtc) + + crc->flip_threshold + - crc->entry_idx, + true); + +out: + spin_unlock(&crc->lock); +} + +static void nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finished(struct nv50_head *head, + const struct nv50_crc_func *func, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = head->base.base.dev; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev); + s64 ret; + + ret = nvif_msec(&drm->client.device, 50, + if (func->...

...} + + nv50_crc_get_entries(head, func, crc->src); + + if (need_reschedule) + drm_vblank_work_schedule(&crc->flip_work, + drm_crtc_vblank_count(crtc) + + crc->flip_threshold + - crc->entry_idx, + true); + +out: + spin_unlock(&crc->lock); +} + +static void nv50_crc_wait_ctx_finished(struct nv50_head *head, + const struct nv50_crc_func *func, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = head->base.base.dev; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev); + s64 ret; + + ret = nvif_msec(&drm->client.device, 50, + if (func->...

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,