search for: nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set".

2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Fix file release memory leak
...100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c > @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static const struct file_operations > nv50_crc_flip_threshold_fops = { > .open = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open, > .read = seq_read, > .write = nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set, > + .release = single_release, > }; > > int nv50_head_crc_late_register(struct nv50_head *head) > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
2020 Oct 06
0
[RFC PATCH v2 1/3] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Introduce some kernel-docs for CRC support
...+++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c index b8c31b697797..84df41e8fb05 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c @@ -699,6 +699,14 @@ nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set(struct file *file, return ret; } +/** + * DOC: nv_crc/flip_threshold + * + * The number of CRC entries to place in a :term:`CRC notifier context` before + * attempting to flip to the other notifier context. Writing ``-1`` to this file + * will reset the threshold to the default value, which is...
2020 Jun 22
0
[RFC v5 10/10] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...;, crc->flip_threshold); + + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static int +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_get, + inode->i_private); +} + +static ssize_t +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set(struct file *file, + const char __user *ubuf, size_t len, + loff_t *offp) +{ + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data; + struct nv50_head *head = m->private; + struct nv50_head_atom *armh; + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_dr...
2020 Mar 18
0
[PATCH 9/9] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...;, crc->flip_threshold); + + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static int +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_get, + inode->i_private); +} + +static ssize_t +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set(struct file *file, + const char __user *ubuf, size_t len, + loff_t *offp) +{ + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data; + struct nv50_head *head = m->private; + struct nv50_head_atom *armh; + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_dr...
2020 Apr 17
0
[RFC v3 11/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...;, crc->flip_threshold); + + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static int +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_get, + inode->i_private); +} + +static ssize_t +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set(struct file *file, + const char __user *ubuf, size_t len, + loff_t *offp) +{ + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data; + struct nv50_head *head = m->private; + struct nv50_head_atom *armh; + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_dr...
2020 May 08
0
[RFC v4 12/12] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...;, crc->flip_threshold); + + drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + return ret; +} + +static int +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_get, + inode->i_private); +} + +static ssize_t +nv50_crc_debugfs_flip_threshold_set(struct file *file, + const char __user *ubuf, size_t len, + loff_t *offp) +{ + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data; + struct nv50_head *head = m->private; + struct nv50_head_atom *armh; + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_dr...
2020 Mar 18
12
[PATCH 0/9] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM
2020 Jun 22
13
[RFC v5 00/10] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 Apr 17
9
[RFC v3 00/11] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM
2020 Jun 27
9
[RFC v8 0/9] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 May 08
16
[RFC v4 00/12] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 Sep 11
6
[RFC] Documentation: nouveau: Introduce some nouveau documentation
Other gpu drivers have some driver-specific documentation, so it would nice if nouveau did as well. This adds a bare-bones ReStructured Text document with sections for module parameter documentation, an overview of the driver architecture, a section for internal API documentation, and a glossary for nouveau-specific terms. To make the document a little less bare, I've included docblocks for
2020 Jun 24
13
[RFC v7 00/11] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,