search for: nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting

...^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:115:14: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] struct nv50_head_atom *) {} ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting?: /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:118:32: error: parameter name omitted nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *) {} ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_crc_atomic_i...

...> /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:115:14: warning: no > return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] > struct nv50_head_atom *) {} > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function > ?nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting?: > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:118:32: error: > parameter name omitted > nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *) {} > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In fu...

...| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:112:16: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] 112 | struct nv50_head_atom *) {} | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting?: ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:114:32: error: parameter name omitted 114 | nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *) {} | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_crc_atomic_prepare_notif...

...iles changed, 97 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c index 0b18d9e3a2b96..f17fb6d56757a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.c @@ -261,7 +261,29 @@ void nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *state) } } -void nv50_crc_atomic_prepare_notifier_contexts(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +void nv50_crc_atomic_init_notifier_contexts(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +{ + struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state; + struct drm_crtc *crtc; + int i; + + for_each_new_crtc_i...

...reak;); + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) + NV_ERROR(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head %d not finished after 50ms\n", + head->base.index); + else if (ret) + NV_ATOMIC(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head-%d finished after %lldns\n", + head->base.index, ret); +} + +void nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +{ + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state; + struct drm_crtc *crtc; + int i; + + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { + struct nv50_head *head = nv50_head(crtc); + struct nv50_head_atom *asyh = nv50_head_atom(crtc_state); + struct nv50_crc *crc =...

...reak;); + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) + NV_ERROR(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head %d not finished after 50ms\n", + head->base.index); + else if (ret) + NV_ATOMIC(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head-%d finished after %lldns\n", + head->base.index, ret); +} + +void nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +{ + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state; + struct drm_crtc *crtc; + int i; + + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { + struct nv50_head *head = nv50_head(crtc); + struct nv50_head_atom *asyh = nv50_head_atom(crtc_state); + struct nv50_crc *crc =...

...reak;); + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) + NV_ERROR(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head %d not finished after 50ms\n", + head->base.index); + else if (ret) + NV_ATOMIC(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head-%d finished after %lldns\n", + head->base.index, ret); +} + +void nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +{ + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state; + struct drm_crtc *crtc; + int i; + + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { + struct nv50_head *head = nv50_head(crtc); + struct nv50_head_atom *asyh = nv50_head_atom(crtc_state); + struct nv50_crc *crc =...

...reak;); + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) + NV_ERROR(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head %d not finished after 50ms\n", + head->base.index); + else if (ret) + NV_ATOMIC(drm, + "CRC notifier ctx for head-%d finished after %lldns\n", + head->base.index, ret); +} + +void nv50_crc_atomic_stop_reporting(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +{ + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state; + struct drm_crtc *crtc; + int i; + + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { + struct nv50_head *head = nv50_head(crtc); + struct nv50_head_atom *asyh = nv50_head_atom(crtc_state); + struct nv50_crc *crc =...

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,