search for: numnodes

....amdil.atomic.add.gi32.noret to the correct instruction with the following code sequence. LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN(...) { ... case AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_atomic_add_gu32_noret: IntNo = AMDILISD::ATOM_G_ADD_NORET; break; ... SDValue Ops[6]; SDValue chain = Op.getOperand(0); unsigned numNodes = 0; if (inChain) { Ops[numNodes++] = chain; } SDValue Chain = Op.getOperand(0); Ops[numNodes++] = Op.getOperand((inChain) ? 2 : 1); Ops[numNodes++] = DAG.getConstant(1, MVT::i32); Ops[numNodes++] = DAG.getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i32); Op = DAG.getNode(IntNo, dl, EVT::EVT(MVT::i32)...

...nstruction with the following code sequence. > > LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN(…) > { > … > case AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_atomic_add_gu32_noret: > IntNo = AMDILISD::ATOM_G_ADD_NORET; break; > … > SDValue Ops[6]; > SDValue chain = Op.getOperand(0); > unsigned numNodes = 0; > if (inChain) { > Ops[numNodes++] = chain; > } > SDValue Chain = Op.getOperand(0); > Ops[numNodes++] = Op.getOperand((inChain) ? 2 : 1); > Ops[numNodes++] = DAG.getConstant(1, MVT::i32); > Ops[numNodes++] = DAG.getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i32); > Op = D...

...> > LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN(...) > > { > > ... > > case AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_atomic_add_gu32_noret: > > IntNo = AMDILISD::ATOM_G_ADD_NORET; break; > > ... > > SDValue Ops[6]; > > SDValue chain = Op.getOperand(0); > > unsigned numNodes = 0; > > if (inChain) { > > Ops[numNodes++] = chain; > > } > > SDValue Chain = Op.getOperand(0); > > Ops[numNodes++] = Op.getOperand((inChain) ? 2 : 1); > > Ops[numNodes++] = DAG.getConstant(1, MVT::i32); > > Ops[numNodes++] = DAG.getTargetC...

..."C:\\Ccodefortransortmodel\\ mylatestversion.dll") * Next, I called equil_distC with testres2 <- .C("equil_distC", as.integer(rowmaxfiets),as.integer(colmaxfiets), as.double(nodes), as.integer(links_dist_calc), as.integer(cyclepathsfirstline), as.integer(numzones), as.integer(numnodes), as.integer(numlinks), result = double(6)) * About half of the time, whenever I had changed the C++ code, the results were either nonsensical or R crashed. * When R did not crash, I unloaded the dll with: dyn.unload("C:\\Ccodefortransortmodel\\equildistCforodpair_2012_09_20v8.dll") * Nex...

...ies in the vector for each of the SUnits we are creating. This // ensure that reallocation of the vector won't happen, so SUnit*'s won't get // invalidated. // FIXME: Multiply by 2 because we may clone nodes during scheduling. // This is a temporary workaround. SUnits.reserve(NumNodes * 2); So for some reason *2 is not enough in your case. I guess the right thing here is to either have a way to reliably estimate the number of SUnits (if it's at all possible) or use a container that doesn't reallocate on insert. Eugene On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Amaury Pouly <a...

Oh yes you're right, I missed that :) But the point still hold. Amaury Pouly 2010/8/8 Eugene Toder <eltoder at gmail.com> > > Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set > > I may be missing something, but why does it not compile with -DNDEBUG? > assert() macro expands to noop when NDEBUG is set. > > Eugene > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Amaury

...///////////////////////////////////////////////////// My function prototype definition: auto vectorDataType = VectorType::get(IntegerType::getIntNTy(TheContext, 64), 4); std::vector<Type *> vecArguments; for (Uint64 nodeId = startOfLeaves; nodeId < numNodes; ++nodeId) { vecArguments.push_back(vectorDataType); } proto = FunctionType::get(vectorDataType,//int64*4 = __m256i vecArguments, false); //////////////////////////////////////////////////...

...follows: #!/bin/sh echo "Generating assembly file." llc -f $1.bc echo "Assembling s file." /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xarch=v9 -lm $1.s -o $1 echo "Removing s file." rm $1.s and here is an example of the symbol issues: Undefined first referenced symbol in file NumNodes Olden-bh.o nbody Olden-bh.o For each bmk, the undefined symbols are coming from args.c as far as I can tell. Do I need to link in args.c's bc file for each of them or am I doing something terribly wrong? ______________________________...

...> > My function prototype definition: > > > > auto vectorDataType = VectorType::get(IntegerType::getIntNTy(TheContext, > 64), 4); > > std::vector<Type *> vecArguments; > > for (Uint64 nodeId = startOfLeaves; nodeId < numNodes; > ++nodeId) { > > vecArguments.push_back(vectorDataType); > > } > > proto = FunctionType::get(vectorDataType,//int64*4 = > __m256i > > vecArguments, false); &...

Dear all, I am using LLVM C++ API to generate some code. In particular, I am dealing with AVX2 SIMD API which uses __m256i. My function input types a set of vectors and return type is also a vector. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// arguments.push_back(VectorType::get(IntegerType::getIntNTy(TheContext, 64), 4));//int64*4 = __m256i

...of(xc_memory_chunk_t) * + PUBLIC_MAXCHUNKS ); + set_xen_guest_handle(info.memory_chunks, chunks); + + /* make space for node_to_cpu mapping */ + map = (xc_node_to_cpu_t *)malloc( sizeof(xc_node_to_cpu_t) * + PUBLIC_MAX_NUMNODES ); + set_xen_guest_handle(info.node_to_cpu, map); + if ( xc_physinfo(self->xc_handle, &info) != 0 ) return PyErr_SetFromErrno(xc_error); @@ -489,16 +502,56 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_physinfo(XcObject if(q>cpu_cap) *(q-1)=0; - return Py_BuildValue(&qu...