search for: numberofauxsymbols

...lt;< "(ty " << format("%3x", symbol->Type.ComplexType) << ")" << "(scl " << format("%3x", symbol->StorageClass) << ") " << "(nx " << unsigned(symbol->NumberOfAuxSymbols) << ") " << "0x" << format("%08x", symbol->Value) << " " << name << "\n"; Are trying to call the format function with struct coff_symbol { struct StringTableOffset { support::u...

...uot;(ty " << format("%3x", symbol->Type.ComplexType) << ")" >              << "(scl " << format("%3x", symbol->StorageClass) << ") " >              << "(nx " << unsigned(symbol->NumberOfAuxSymbols) << ") " >              << "0x" << format("%08x", symbol->Value) << " " >              << name << "\n"; > Are trying to call the format function with > struct coff_symbol { >   struct StringTable...

...t;>> >>>>> But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >>>>> >>>>> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >>>>> // This symbol represents a section definition. >>>>> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >>>>> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this >>>>> section!"); >>>>> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >>>>> reinterpret_cast<const object::coff_aux...

...gt;>>> But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >>>>>> >>>>>> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >>>>>> // This symbol represents a section definition. >>>>>> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >>>>>> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this >>>>>> section!"); >>>>>> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >>>>>> reinterpret_cast<const...

...But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >>>>>>> // This symbol represents a section definition. >>>>>>> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >>>>>>> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this >>>>>>> section!"); >>>>>>> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >>>>>>> reinterpre...

...you astray :) >>>> >>>> But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >>>> >>>> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >>>> // This symbol represents a section definition. >>>> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >>>> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this >>>> section!"); >>>> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >>>> reinterpret_cast<const object::coff_aux_section_definit...

...e code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >>>>>>>> // This symbol represents a section definition. >>>>>>>> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >>>>>>>> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this >>>>>>>> section!"); >>>>>>>> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >>>>>>>>...

...lly I'm not leading you astray :) >>> >>> But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >>> >>> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >>> // This symbol represents a section definition. >>> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >>> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this section!"); >>> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >>> reinterpret_cast<const object::coff_aux_section_definition >>> *>( >&...

...n't really dabbled in this part of the COFF format personally, so hopefully I'm not leading you astray :) But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { // This symbol represents a section definition. assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this section!"); const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = reinterpret_cast<const object::coff_aux_section_definition *>( AuxData.data()); So it looks like you ne...

...rt of the COFF format personally, so > hopefully I'm not leading you astray :) > > But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: > > } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { > // This symbol represents a section definition. > assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && > "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this section!"); > const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = > reinterpret_cast<const object::coff_aux_section_definition *>( > AuxData.data()); >...

...ally, so >> hopefully I'm not leading you astray :) >> >> But I checked the code for coff2yaml, and I see this: >> >> } else if (Symbol.isSectionDefinition()) { >> // This symbol represents a section definition. >> assert(Symbol.getNumberOfAuxSymbols() == 1 && >> "Expected a single aux symbol to describe this section!"); >> const object::coff_aux_section_definition *ObjSD = >> reinterpret_cast<const object::coff_aux_section_definition *>( >> AuxDa...

...#39;s a structure called coff::symbol which basically represents each > one of these records. It looks like this: > > ``` > struct symbol { > char Name[NameSize]; > uint32_t Value; > int32_t SectionNumber; > uint16_t Type; > uint8_t StorageClass; > uint8_t NumberOfAuxSymbols; > }; > ``` > > So you'll need to create one for the debug$H section and stick it into the > list. This particular list doesn't have to be in any special order, so you > can just put it at the end (although it's probably not that much harder to > insert into the mi...

...0 Number: 0 ... ``` There's a structure called coff::symbol which basically represents each one of these records. It looks like this: ``` struct symbol { char Name[NameSize]; uint32_t Value; int32_t SectionNumber; uint16_t Type; uint8_t StorageClass; uint8_t NumberOfAuxSymbols; }; ``` So you'll need to create one for the debug$H section and stick it into the list. This particular list doesn't have to be in any special order, so you can just put it at the end (although it's probably not that much harder to insert into the middle, and it will make for a good...

Any idea on how to create this new symbol there? I saw that there is a symbol pointing to each section, but didn't understand the format, and yaml2obj doesn't check it or do anything with the list. On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com> wrote: > YES, THANK YOU... I WAS THINKING THIS BUT COMPLETELY FORGOT. > > sorry for the caps... long