search for: number6

...win]/root: portupgrade -aRn ---> Session started at: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:54:00 +1000 closed stream ---> Session ended at: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:54:01 +1000 (consumed 00:00:01) [root@erwin]/root: pkgdb -F does the same thing. Any clues? cheers, Rob [root@erwin]/root: uname -a FreeBSD erwin.number6 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #1: Wed May 21 00:52:39 EST 2003 root@erwin.number6:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ERWIN alpha -- If it weren't for lawyers, I think we could have invented a universal symbolic representation of reality. This is random quote 648 of 1254. Distance from the centre...

...ffe0004a53b70 vp 0xfffffe000b683ec0 size: 65536, resid: 65536, a_count: 65536, valid: 0x0 nread: 0, reqpage: 0, pindex: 0, pcount: 0 /sbin/halt: Input/output error So I had to hard reset the box. It came back OK after a fsck, nothing in the logs at all root@erwin ~ % uname -a FreeBSD erwin.number6 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 9 16:34:34 EST 2003 root@erwin.number6:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ERWIN alpha Any clues as to what went awry? Cheers, Rob

On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version 1.0.15 with: rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in /usr/local is

I mean, in the source directory. On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > dovecot. > > On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >> 1.0.15 with: >> >> rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot >> >> However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and >> ready to start testing wit...

My /var/log/maillog was getting pretty big because of lots of testing and re-configuring I've been doing lately with both Dovecot and Postfix. I figured just remove /var/log/maillog and it would be re-created. It wasn't--not by Dovecot, not by Postfix. I had to manually create a new one, put one character in it, save it, properly secure it with chmod, and then Dovecot (and postfix)

After applying some changes to 10-master.conf as detailed at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I receive the following when trying to start: doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf line 49: Expecting '{' I'm trying to enable LMTP. The instructions say: Socket configuration The actual socket is configured in

...ected: User unknown in local recipient table Last-attempt-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:23:38 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.140] ([108.41.57.11]) ??? by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA ??? id MnpFiaSdxUnHgMnpFiYE6m; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:39:25 -0700 To: rock at theglobalvoice.info From: Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> Subject: Testing again Message-ID: <61b4f0c2-89fa-c4de-8288-871a8708f2d0 at noisynotes.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 02:39:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 ?Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; c...

On Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21:41 -0500, you wrote: > >On May 21, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Steve Matzura wrote: > >> I needed to receive a message to admin at mydomain.com. I waited and >> waited for it, but it never showed up in the admin mailbox on the >> mydomain.com machine. So I looked for the admin account in >> /etc/dovecot.passwd, and there it was, plain-text password

Since I've decided to go to version 2, which is a lot more difficult to set up because I have to look in a lot more places than I did with version 1.0.15, what do I do with the old dovecot/passwd or its contents? I see no references to it in any of the stuff in conf.d or doc/dovecot/wiki. As always, thanks in advance.

My system has a great big four users. The Dovecot wiki says LMTP is more efficient, and someone on IRC told me I'd need it if I were ever to use sieve, which at this time I have no intention of doing. Should I stick with LDA, or just implement LMTP so I'm ready if ever I need it in the future? The bottom line is, it's unclear from the wiki how to explicitly specify use of one or the

....e. dont need to have a local account at all), all mail gets delivered to Maildirs owned by dovecot. Also LMTP makes it easier to insert scripts and do any custom processing which presumably is where Sieve comes in. Its also pretty easy to setup. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > My system has a great big four users. The Dovecot wiki says LMTP is > more efficient, and someone on IRC told me I'd need it if I were ever > to use sieve, which at this time I have no intention of doing. Should > I stick with LDA, or just implement L...

Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things dovecot. On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version > 1.0.15 with: > > rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot > > However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and > ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old ve...

*make clean* then? On 12 June 2015 at 15:52, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:13:18 +0300, you wrote: > > >Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > >dovecot. > > I tried, but got: > > make: *** No target to make `distclean'. Stop. >

...* No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. >On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > >> Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things >> dovecot. >> >> On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: >> >>> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >>> 1.0.15 with: >>> >>> rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot >>> >>> However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and >&gt...

There might be a whitespace. Try pasting what you copied to notepad or gedit (depending on your OS) then copy/pasting here again. On 12 Jun 2015 18:25, "Steve Matzura" <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > After applying some changes to 10-master.conf as detailed at > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I receive the > following when trying to start: > > doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file > /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf &g...

...th of lmtp. On 13 Jun 2015 08:05, "Muzaffer Tolga Ozses" <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > There might be a whitespace. Try pasting what you copied to notepad or > gedit (depending on your OS) then copy/pasting here again. > On 12 Jun 2015 18:25, "Steve Matzura" <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> After applying some changes to 10-master.conf as detailed at >> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I receive the >> following when trying to start: >> >> doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file >> /etc/dove...

Look into logrotate, and turn off your debugging stuff. On 13 Jun 2015 15:02, "Steve Matzura" <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > My /var/log/maillog was getting pretty big because of lots of testing > and re-configuring I've been doing lately with both Dovecot and > Postfix. I figured just remove /var/log/maillog and it would be > re-created. It wasn't--not by Dovecot, not...

Look at /etc/hosts ::1 is the ipv6 version of localhost.? Sent from Samsung tablet -------- Original message -------- From Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> Date: 06/13/2015 6:00 AM (GMT-06:00) To dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject Testin new installation The first place I went to for test advice and planning recommendations was http://wiki2.dovecot.org/TestInstallation - The very first test failed. Doc says:...

Im assuming you found "doveadm" ? On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > passwd solved. > -- Aj. Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/ajaikhattri> Enoland <https://flipboard.com/@eno/enoland-be2ss0apy>

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:27:58 -0500, you wrote: >No attempt to deliver almost always means either: >- a DNS problem; the sender can't find the destination, or finds the >"wrong" destination. That would be interesting, since I tried both the actual IP address and the DNS name for the test node. Neither message got through. >- a connectivity problem; the sender can't