search for: numarg

...rashes depending on wether they had a name set or not (all combinations of these two parameters), but those seem to be quiescent at the time. Any ideas? Thanks, Marcel ------- my weird code.m ------------ -argumentAtIndex:(int)argIndex { Argument *ArgX; if ( argIndex < numArgs ) { int i; ArgX = ((Function*)function)->arg_begin(); for (i=0 ;i<argIndex;i++) { ++ArgX; } [NSString stringWithFormat:@"get argument[%d/%d]= %x",argIndex,numArgs,ArgX];...

...gt; (all combinations of these two parameters), but those seem to be > quiescent at the time. Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Marcel > > > ------- my weird code.m ------------ > -argumentAtIndex:(int)argIndex > { > Argument *ArgX; > if ( argIndex < numArgs ) { > int i; > ArgX = ((Function*)function)->arg_begin(); > for (i=0 ;i<argIndex;i++) { > ++ArgX; > } > > [NSString stringWithFormat:@"get argument[%d/%d]= > %...

...is the code from bindings/ocam/executionengine/executionengine_ocaml.c. /* llvalue -> GenericValue.t array -> ExecutionEngine.t -> GenericValue.t */ CAMLprim value llvm_ee_run_function(LLVMValueRef F, value Args, LLVMExecutionEngineRef EE) { unsigned NumArgs; LLVMGenericValueRef Result, *GVArgs; unsigned I; NumArgs = Wosize_val(Args); GVArgs = (LLVMGenericValueRef*) malloc(NumArgs * sizeof(LLVMGenericValueRef)); for (I = 0; I != NumArgs; ++I) GVArgs[I] = Genericvalue_val(Field(Args, I)); Result = LLVMRunFunction(EE, F, NumArgs, GVArg...

...nstruction *InsertBefore = 0); However, it seems as though that constructor has been removed. I assume that I'm suppossed to use the following constructor, but I can't figure out what to pass as the Args parameter (the second parameter). CallInst (Value *F, Value *const *Args, unsigned NumArgs, const std::string &Name="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) Can someone help? Thanks, Ryan

...> > However, it seems as though that constructor has been removed. I assume > that I'm suppossed to use the following constructor, but I can't figure > out what to pass as the Args parameter (the second parameter). > > CallInst (Value *F, Value *const *Args, unsigned NumArgs, const > std::string &Name="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) > > Can someone help? Ryan, I suggest you familiarize yourself with http://llvm.org/doxygen/classes.html and look there for help on the new API. It is regenerated every night so it should be perpetually up to dat...

...fundamental shortcoming of the SSH protocol that argument splitting is not preserved from client to server, but instead the argument list is re-split on whitespace. E.g., from my machine `gellar', I execute: % ssh gellar args foo bar 'baz bong' ARG0 = /usr/home/gregb/bin/share/args, NumArgs = 4 1 = "foo" 2 = "bar" 3 = "baz" 4 = "bong" (where args is just a script that outputs the arguments), instead of what I get when I run args directly: % args foo bar 'baz bong' ARG0 = /usr/home/gregb/bin/share/args, NumArgs = 3 1 = "foo...

...ment list of the function. 2. Based on its data type like character array or integer array, pointer, int, char, take different action. 3. I have added following code to check its data type. // F is any function basically of type function * FunctionType *FTy = F->getFunctionType(); unsigned int numArgs = FTy->getNumParams(); //Currently just checking data type of the 0th argument. Eventually will be running it in the loop from 0 to numArgs. errs() << "\n1 Argument type int 32 : " << FTy->getParamType(0)->isIntegerTy(32); errs() << "\n2 Argument type...

...ever, it seems as though that constructor has been removed. I assume >> that I'm suppossed to use the following constructor, but I can't figure >> out what to pass as the Args parameter (the second parameter). >> >> CallInst (Value *F, Value *const *Args, unsigned NumArgs, const >> std::string &Name="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) >> >> Can someone help? > > Ryan, I suggest you familiarize yourself with > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classes.html and look there for help on the new > API. It is regenerated every night so it...

...> + > +/* Allocate and copy args into req->argbuf */ > +static int copy_args_to_argbuf(struct fuse_req *req) > +{ > + unsigned int offset = 0; > + unsigned int num_in; > + unsigned int num_out; > + unsigned int len; > + unsigned int i; > + > + num_in = req->in.numargs - req->in.argpages; > + num_out = req->out.numargs - req->out.argpages; > + len = fuse_len_args(num_in, (struct fuse_arg *)req->in.args) + > + fuse_len_args(num_out, req->out.args); > + > + req->argbuf = kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (!req->argbuf) &...

...> + > +/* Allocate and copy args into req->argbuf */ > +static int copy_args_to_argbuf(struct fuse_req *req) > +{ > + unsigned int offset = 0; > + unsigned int num_in; > + unsigned int num_out; > + unsigned int len; > + unsigned int i; > + > + num_in = req->in.numargs - req->in.argpages; > + num_out = req->out.numargs - req->out.argpages; > + len = fuse_len_args(num_in, (struct fuse_arg *)req->in.args) + > + fuse_len_args(num_out, req->out.args); > + > + req->argbuf = kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (!req->argbuf) &...

> Can't you handle this entirely in the front-end? Just decide by fiat > that all of your scheme functions will take an extra (hidden to the > Scheme users) parameter saying how many args they were given. That's > how C++ deals with the implicit "this" parameter for class methods. > Then you could either use varargs or bitcast your functions to a > reasonable

...actual memory object passed into the function will be. A caller can cast a pointer of one structure type to a different structure type and pass that into a function. > > // F is any function basically of type function * > FunctionType *FTy = F->getFunctionType(); > unsigned int numArgs = FTy->getNumParams(); > > //Currently just checking data type of the 0th argument. Eventually > will be running it in the loop from 0 to numArgs. > errs() << "\n1 Argument type int 32 : " << > FTy->getParamType(0)->isIntegerTy(32); > errs() &lt...

...perand(1), CI->getOperand(2), Index: llvm/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.115 diff -r1.115 Verifier.cpp 714,715c714,715 < case Intrinsic::gcread: NumArgs = 1; break; < case Intrinsic::gcwrite: NumArgs = 2; break; --- > case Intrinsic::gcread: NumArgs = 2; break; > case Intrinsic::gcwrite: NumArgs = 3; break; Index: llvm/runtime/GC/GCInterface.h =================================================================...

...fc = fs->vqs[queue_id].fud->fc; - dev_dbg(&fs->vqs[queue_id].vq->vdev->dev, - "%s: opcode %u unique %#llx nodeid %#llx in.len %u out.len %u\n", - __func__, req->in.h.opcode, req->in.h.unique, req->in.h.nodeid, - req->in.h.len, fuse_len_args(req->out.numargs, req->out.args)); + pr_debug("%s: opcode %u unique %#llx nodeid %#llx in.len %u out.len %u" + "\n", __func__, req->in.h.opcode, req->in.h.unique, + req->in.h.nodeid, req->in.h.len, + fuse_len_args(req->out.numargs, req->out.args)); fpq = &fs-&...

Hi, In Asterisk 1.2.7, my AEL code looks like this: macro callForwardHunt(numargs,numlist,typelist,ttr) { for(x=1;${x}<${numargs}+1;x=${x}+1) { CUT(number=numlist,-,${x}); CUT(type=typelist,-,${x}); NoOp(${number}); NoOp(${type}); Dial(${type}${number},${ttr}); };...

> Args needs to be an array of the arguments and NumArgs needs to be the > size of the array. If you have a std::vector then you can just: > > new CallInst(F, &ArgVec[0], ArgVec.size(), ...) Doesn't the code above make an assumption about how std::vector is implemented? If ArgVec is defined as std::vector<Value*> ArgVec; the...

In /var/log/syslog Dec 23 13:04:50 ************** upsmon[2010]: Poll UPS [rack1ups at localhost] failed - Write error: Broken pipe After this, there is no longer a upsd daemon running. Error messages follow: Dec 23 13:04:50 ************** upsmon[2010]: Communications with UPS rack1ups at localhost lost ... Dec 23 13:04:55 ************** upsmon[2010]: UPS [rack1ups at localhost]: connect

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > Hi, I'm thinking out loud, please give me some feedback. > > Regarding llvm.gcread and llvm.gcwrite, wouldn't it be nicer if they are > implemented as: > > llvm.gcread(sbyte** object, uint offset) > llvm.gcwrite(sbyte* data, sbyte** object, uint offset) > > Where you also have the offset into the object. In

...s line causes assert instr_asm # "\t\t$r1, $addr, " # info.sizeStr, [(set info.regClass:$r1, (load ADDR_SHLI:$addr))], itin > { } The other related definitions are: // This class provides load/store address format selection support // class Addr< int numArgs, string funcName, dag opInfo > : Operand<i64>, ComplexPattern< i64, numArgs, funcName, [], [SDNPWantParent] > { let MIOperandInfo = opInfo; } let PrintMethod = "printMemOperand" in { def ADDR_RR : Addr< 2, "SelectAddrRegReg",...

...39; Intrinsic > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Syntax: > """"""" > > :: > > declare void (i32, i32, i8*, i32, ...)* > @llvm.webkit.patchpoint.void(i32 <id>, i32 <numBytes>, i8* <target>, i32 > <numArgs>, ...) > declare i64 (i32, i32, i8*, i32, ...)* > @llvm.webkit.patchpoint.i64(i32 <id>, i32 <numBytes>, i8* <target>, i32 > <numArgs>, ...) > > Overview: > """"""""" > > The '``llvm.webkit.pat...