Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "num_workers_starting".
2011 Dec 23
2
re: Btrfs: fix num_workers_starting bug and other bugs in async thread
Hi Josef,
Smatch complains about this change introduces a double unlock.
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c +608 find_worker(49) error: double unlock ''spin_lock:&workers->lock''
579 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We unlock here.
580