Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "num_succ".
Did you mean:
num_src
2006 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] Critical edges
...k * src = src_blocks[u];
MachineBasicBlock * dst = dst_blocks[u];
split_critical_edge(*src, *dst, mf);
}
return src_blocks.size() > 0;
}
bool CriticalEdgeRemoval_Fer::is_critical_edge
(const MachineBasicBlock & src, const MachineBasicBlock & dst) {
unsigned num_succ = 0;
unsigned num_pred = 0;
bool src_has_many_succ = false;
bool dst_has_many_pred = false;
for(MachineBasicBlock::const_succ_iterator succ = src.succ_begin();
succ != src.succ_end(); succ++) {
num_succ++;
if(num_succ > 1) {...
2006 Jul 04
2
[LLVMdev] Critical edges
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote:
> However, it does not remove all the critical edges. I am getting a very
> weird dataflow graph (even without the Break Critical edges pass). The
> dataflow generated by MachineFunction::dump() for the program below is
> given here:
> http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/fernando/projects/soc/images/loop_no_crit2.pdf
...
> The