Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "num_servic".
Did you mean:
enum_service
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
> >
> > for (i=0; i<num_servers;
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hi,
So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) {
NTSTATUS status;
status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap,
NULL, /* local_addr */
state->servers[i],
&state->cldap[i]);
if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) {
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
2016 Oct 17
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On 2016-10-17 18:13, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
>
> for (i=0; i<num_servers;
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:13:46PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-10-17 18:13, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I did some digging into the source code, and I
2016 Oct 17
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
>
> for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) {
> NTSTATUS status;
>
> status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap,
> NULL, /* local_addr */
2016 Oct 13
3
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
According to this bugzilla entry, bug 6870 has been fixed as of at least
version 3.5:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6870
However, I assert that it is present in 4.2.10, which ships with Debian
Jessie.
On my home network (IPv4 and IPv6), a box with Samba 4.2.10 with IPv6
disabled (via sysctl), will fail to contact a DC because the IPv6
connect fails immediately before the v4