Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "num_elms".
Did you mean:
num_elems
2011 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
...erator.
Indeed, I liked the way it's hidden in DIBuilder. Also the way
typerefs are dealt with, too, is very good.
Would be good to split CreateLocalVariable into CreateArgValue and
CreateAutoVariable. Also would be good to have a simpler array types
creation (CreateArrayType(size, align, ty, num_elms)).
cheers,
--renato
2011 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
On Feb 25, 2011, at 5:23 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 24 February 2011 21:34, Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>
> It simplified a bit type construction but the overall code did not
> reduce that much.
The old interface expected FEs to keep track of everything, where as new
2011 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> Would be good to split CreateLocalVariable into CreateArgValue and
> CreateAutoVariable. Also would be good to have a simpler array types
> creation (CreateArrayType(size, align, ty, num_elms)).
That'd be straight forward to do. Patches welcome!
-
Devang
2011 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
On 24 February 2011 21:34, Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
It simplified a bit type construction but the overall code did not
reduce that much. It's still very similar to the previous style but
had a few differences in the IR output.
We had LIT tests that checked the IR and Dwarf and GDB