Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "num_comparison_run".
Did you mean:
num_comparison_runs
2014 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] Why is the default LNT aggregation function min instead of mean
...lts picking
'min' seems to be an inferior choice.
For all test runs I have looked at, picking mean largely reduces the
run-over-run changes reported due to noise.
See this run e.g:
If we use the median, we just get just one change reported:
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20661?num_comparison_runs=10&test_filter=&test_min_value_filter=&aggregation_fn=median&compare_to=20659&submit=Update
If you use min, we get eight reports one claiming over 100% performance
reduction for a case that is really just pure noise. I am planning to
look into using better statistical methods...
2014 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] Why is the default LNT aggregation function min instead of mean
...l test runs I have looked at, picking mean largely reduces the
> run-over-run changes reported due to noise.
> >
> > See this run e.g:
> >
> > If we use the median, we just get just one change reported:
> >
> >
> http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20661?num_comparison_runs=10&test_filter=&test_min_value_filter=&aggregation_fn=median&compare_to=20659&submit=Update
> >
> > If you use min, we get eight reports one claiming over 100% performance
> > reduction for a case that is really just pure noise. I am planning to
> look into...
2014 Jan 07
3
[LLVMdev] New -O3 Performance tester - Use hardware to get reliable numbers
...sions/changes easily.
The results that have been reported so far seem to provide sufficient
information to catch performance changes. Specifically, when setting the
aggregation function to median, most runs are shown to not impact
performance:
e.g:
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19939?num_comparison_runs=10&test_filter=&test_min_value_filter=&aggregation_fn=median&compare_to=19934&submit=Update
We still have a couple of runs that report performance differences, but
where looking at the performance graph of the changed test cases makes
it very clear that those are false posit...
2014 Apr 29
4
[LLVMdev] RFC:LNT Improvements
Dear all,
Following the Benchmarking BOF from 2013 US dev meeting, I’d like to propose some improvements to the LNT performance tracking software.
The most significant issue with current implementation is that the report is filled with extremely noisy values. Hence it is hard to notice performance improvements or regressions.
After investigation of LNT and the LLVM test suite, I propose