search for: num_aces

...group_sid : S-1-5-21-197107965-2004198405-1252158227-512 sacl : * sacl: struct security_acl revision : SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_ADS (4) size : 0x0078 (120) num_aces : 0x00000002 (2) [...] I assume that it isn't safe to use ldbedit in a multi-DC environment, though, particularly whilst Samba is running.. but maybe I am under-estimating its capabilities? From https://ldb.samba.org/ it is "Safe multi-reader, multi-writer, using byte rang...

...7-656557748-512 > ???????sacl ????????????????????: NULL > ???????dacl ????????????????????: * > ???????????dacl: struct security_acl > ???????????????revision ????????????????: SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_NT4 (2) > ???????????????size ????????????????????: 0x0098 (152) > ???????????????num_aces ????????????????: 0x00000006 (6) > ???????????????aces: ARRAY(6) > ???????????????????aces: struct security_ace > ???????????????????????type ????????????????????: > SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) > ???????????????????????flags ???????????????????: 0x03 (3) > ???????????????????...

...t; sacl : NULL > dacl : * > dacl: struct security_acl > revision : SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_NT4 (2) > size : 0x017c (380) > num_aces : 0x00000010 (16) > aces: ARRAY(16) > aces: struct security_ace > type : > SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) > flags : 0x03 (3) >...

On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? > The one linked to in AD DC wiki. Where abouts is this link ? I checked here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller But couldn't

...ESC_RM_CONTROL_VALID 1: SEC_DESC_SELF_RELATIVE owner_sid: * owner_sid: S-1-5-21-940051827-2291820289-3341758437-512 group_sid: * group_sid: S-1-5-21-940051827-2291820289-3341758437-512 sacl: NULL dacl: * dacl: struct security_acl revision: SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_ADS (4) size: 0x00c4 (196) num_aces: 0x00000007 (7) aces: ARRAY(7) aces: struct security_ace type: SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) flags: 0x03 (3) 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_OBJECT_INHERIT 1: SEC_ACE_FLAG_CONTAINER_INHERIT 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_INHERIT_ONLY 0: SEC_ACE_FLAG_INHERITED_ACE 0x03: SEC_ACE_FLA...

...2/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(606) >| 0014 revision: 0002 >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(606) >| 0016 size : 001c >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) >| 0018 num_aces : 00000001 >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 8] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82) >| 00001c sec_io_ace ace_list[00]: >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(577) >| 001c type : 00 >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8...

...: > S-1-5-21-197107965-2004198405-1252158227-512 > sacl : * > sacl: struct security_acl > revision : SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_ADS (4) > size : 0x0078 (120) > num_aces : 0x00000002 (2) > [...] > > I assume that it isn't safe to use ldbedit in a multi-DC environment, > though, particularly whilst Samba is running.. but maybe I am > under-estimating its capabilities? From https://ldb.samba.org/ it is > "Safe multi-reader,...

...group_sid : S-1-5-21-801203796-115225906-466470621-512 sacl : * sacl: struct security_acl revision : SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_ADS (4) size : 0x0078 (120) num_aces : 0x00000002 (2) aces: ARRAY(2) aces: struct security_ace type : SEC_ACE_TYPE_SYSTEM_AUDIT_OBJECT (7) flags : 0x5a (90) 0: SEC_AC...

Hi list, Since I've upgraded from samba 3.0.23c to 3.0.25c my ACL's don't work as expected anymore. I'm not sure where the problem is, however. The symptoms are simple: with 3.0.23c, I could grant and revoke user, group and world write access to and from files in a share. With 3.0.25c, I can't do that anymore. When I deselect group or world read access and apply the

...dacl : * >>> dacl: struct security_acl >>> revision : SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_NT4 >>> (2) >>> size : 0x017c (380) >>> num_aces : 0x00000010 (16) >>> aces: ARRAY(16) >>> aces: struct security_ace >>> type : >>> SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) >>> fla...

...: NULL >> dacl : * >> dacl: struct security_acl >> revision : SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_NT4 (2) >> size : 0x017c (380) >> num_aces : 0x00000010 (16) >> aces: ARRAY(16) >> aces: struct security_ace >> type : >> SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) >> flags...

I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to the experts :) I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below. ;; ANSWER SECTION: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

...: * > dacl: struct security_acl > revision : > SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_NT4 (2) > size : 0x017c (380) > num_aces : 0x00000010 (16) > aces: ARRAY(16) > aces: struct security_ace > type : > SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED (0) >...

Hi, A while ago I successfully set permissions on a section of my LDAP / AD tree, using either ADUC or ADSIEDIT (I forget which). These permissions allowed my own user to access this section of the tree; I removed permissions for 'Domain Admins' etc. to ensure that others would not be able to view or change the data - this has worked great for many months. I have just tried to add a new

Hello, I've got a problem with printing on a Windows 2K box. Printing from that box to a samba server via the normal print mechanism works fine. The problem is when the person needs to print to a lpt port. The capture succeeds, but when the file is copied to lpt2 it never gets printed. There are other machines that can do the capture and copy to the lpt port but they are Win 9x. The

...000014 sec_io_acl dacl [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 0014 revision: 0003 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 0016 size : 0064 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0018 num_aces : 00000004 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 8] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 00001c sec_io_ace ace_list[00]: [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 001c type : 00 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 001d f...

...o_acl dacl [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 003c revision: 0002 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 003e size : 0064 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0040 num_aces : 00000003 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 9] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 000044 sec_io_ace ace_list[00]: [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 0044 type : 00 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530)...

...o_acl dacl [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 003c revision: 0002 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 003e size : 0064 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0040 num_aces : 00000003 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 9] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 000044 sec_io_ace ace_list[00]: [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 0044 type : 00 [2003/01/02 18:35:32, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530)...

i can use the smbclient -L just fine to get a list of shares off my NT4 (Alpha processor) server. My problem lies with rpcclient. It lets me login but then samtest gives the following error: smb: \> samtest samtest SAM Encryption Test SAMR_R_UNKNOWN_38: Unknown NT error smb: \> all i need to be able to do is change the nt password, but the ntpass command gives the same error. any ideas