search for: nullnul

I'm a Windows user, and wish to run LLVM-Clang on Windows. In Visual Studio 2010, buidling was fairly straightforward via the solution file from CMake. However, there is no good document (thought I searched for an hour) how to compile LLVM with MinGW on Windows. I generated MinGW Makefile and build directories from CMake. I installed entire MinGW+MSys packages. I tried to run "make -f

Figuring out to insert new compiling options or changing some options are very hard for a CMake newbie. I'm working on Windows (both Visual Studio, MingW/MSYS) via CMake. In particular, I'd like to do following two things: (1) I'd like to add "-std=c++0x" for some files in lib\Transforms\Instrumentation. (I don't think it's good idea to put this option entirely) (2)

On 2/12/2011 6:58 PM, nullnull wrote: > I'm a Windows user, and wish to run LLVM-Clang on Windows. > In Visual Studio 2010, buidling was fairly straightforward via the > solution file from CMake. However, there is no good document (thought > I searched for an hour) how to compile LLVM with MinGW on Windows. &g...

I'm instrumenting memory loads and stores in a LLVM module pass. In this work, I need to do (1) Getting memory address of the operand, (Looks I've done correctly) (2) Getting memory read/write size, (Question) (3) Location id of the load/store instruction. (Easy, I've done) For example, say that I'm reading a local variable 'a': %1 = load i32* %a, align 4 I need to know

I'd like to run my own passes (implemented as .so) via the opt tool on a linked bitcode. >opt -load=my_own_pass.so -do_my_passes ... test.bc > test.output.bc However, my passes require other LLVM's passes before and after. For example, the ordering of passes that I want: (1) A couple of LLVM's passes ==> (2) my_loop_pass ==> (3) my_module_pass ==> (4) Other

I'm actively working on Windows with LLVM/clang (not directly contributing yet). First of all, it does compile on Windows (only tested in Visual Studio 2010). But, there are still many problems: (1) x86-64 won't compile as far as I know. CMake generates 64-bit soultion, but one project is missing. But, 32-bit solution compiles safely. (2) Although safe compiliation, there are many

Hi, This may be a daft question, but I have just begun taking a serious look at LLVM for a project that I am working on. Knowing myself pretty well, the probability that I ever complete the project is infinitesimal. I am saying this so you don't jump up out of your chair, yelling "HOORAY!" because I am considering to use LLVM. Think of me as an academic student with too much