search for: ntri

I am trying to understand what is the difference between linear and polynomial kernel: linear: u'*v polynomial: (gamma*u'*v + coef0)^degree It would seem that polynomial kernel with gamma = 1; coef0 = 0 and degree = 1 should be identical to linear kernel, however it gives me significantly different results for very simple data set, with linear kernel

Hello list I've been studying libvorbis code and found a strange fragment in smallft.c: 38 static void drfti1(int n, float *wa, int *ifac){ 39 static int ntryh[4] = { 4,2,3,5 }; 40 static float tpi = 6.28318530717958648f; 41 float arg,argh,argld,fi; 42 int ntry=0,i,j=-1; 43 int k1, l1, l2, ib; 44 int ld, ii, ip, is, nq, nr; 45 int ido, ipm, nfm1; 46 int nl=n; 47 int nf=0;

...s in readChar header <-paste("This is a very long and boring text header which appears", "at the beginning of each chunk of an even longer and duller", "file which contains mostly binary data") nchars <- nchar(header) nrecs <-2000 ntries <- 100 ## Write a test file stream <- file("/tmp/gunge") open(stream,open="wb") for(irec in 1:nrecs){ ## This writes null-ended strings unless you use the eos=NULL option writeChar(header,stream,eos=NULL) } close(stream) ## Read in the file ntries times. In real ap...

On a CentOS 6.7 system that's been running fail2ban for a long time, we recently started seeing this: ct 28 19:00:59 <servername> fail2ban.action[17561]: ERROR iptables -w -D INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j f2b-SSH#012iptables -w -F f2b-SSH#012iptables -w -X f2b-SSH -- stderr: "iptables v1.4.7: option `-w' requires an argument\nTry `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for

Large for loops are slow. Try to avoid them using apply, sapply, etc. I've made the paste statements a lot shorter by using collapse. See ?paste for more info. Append.SQL <- function(x, channel){ sql="INSERT INTO logger (time, v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10) VALUES("d1=strptime(x[2],"%d/%m/%y %H:%M:%S %p '", d1, "' ,", paste(x[3:12],

This should probably be a bug report for the fail2ban EPEL maintainer, the problem was introduced in version 0.9.3 >From the file /etc/fail2ban/action.d/iptables-common.conf ... # Option: lockingopt # Notes.: Option was introduced to iptables to prevent multiple instances from # running concurrently and causing irratic behavior. -w was introduced # in iptables 1.4.20, so

Wrap "copy/nbd-ops.c" at 80 characters. I couldn't find a way to test that this change is unobservable. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172516 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com> --- copy/nbd-ops.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/copy/nbd-ops.c b/copy/nbd-ops.c index d3e50864125f..843b7c1746e3

...f (5 + 5) / ( 32 + 8 + 5 + 17), which is clearly better than the one that I got from using pamr.adaptthresh(). Am I doing something wrong? What do I need to do to ensure that pamr.adaptthresh() returns the least mis-classification error rate? I have tried using different values for 'ntries', and 'reduction factor' in pamr.adaptthresh(), without any success. I have reproduced my code below. Any comments would be appreciated! thanks. ########################### CODE ################################# library(multtest) # golub library(siggenes) # SAM...

...+ 5) / ( 32 + 8 + 5 + 17), which is clearly better than the one that I got from using pamr.adaptthresh(). Am I doing something wrong? What do I need to do to ensure that pamr.adaptthresh() returns the least mis-classification error rate? I have tried using different values for 'ntries', and 'reduction factor' in pamr.adaptthresh(), without any success. I have reproduced my code below. Any comments would be appreciated! thanks. ########################### CODE ################################# library(base) library(graphics) library(p...

...f (5 + 5) / ( 32 + 8 + 5 + 17), which is clearly better than the one that I got from using pamr.adaptthresh(). Am I doing something wrong? What do I need to do to ensure that pamr.adaptthresh() returns the least mis-classification error rate? I have tried using different values for 'ntries', and 'reduction factor' in pamr.adaptthresh(), without any success. I have reproduced my code below. Any comments would be appreciated! thanks. ########################### CODE ################################# library(multtest) # golub library(siggenes) # SAM...

...The code that works is: ################### WORKS ############### library(pamr) set.seed(120) x <- matrix(rnorm(1000*20),ncol=20) y <- sample(c(1:4),size=20,replace=TRUE) mydata <- list(x=x,y=y) mytrain <- pamr.train(mydata) new.scales <- pamr.adaptthresh(mytrain,ntries = 1) ######################################## But if I split the lines into two functions, then I get an error message that reads : 'Error in pamr.train(data = myd2, threshold = threshold, threshold.scale = all.scales[i+ : object "myd2" not found.' The code t...

Originally an attempt to fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570407 However this isn't a complete fix. The OVA supplied doesn't even conform to VMware's own "specification" (I use the word loosely). The OVF inside the OVA references the disk.vmdk file, but the OVA doesn't contain that disk.vmdk file, only a snapshot called disk.vmdk.000000000. Therefore

Introduce a new Checksums module to handle the check of checksums, moving part of the Sigchecker code to it. Adapt the rest of virt-builder to this new module. --- builder/Makefile.am | 2 ++ builder/builder.ml | 2 +- builder/checksums.ml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ builder/checksums.mli | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ builder/index_parser.ml | 4

Move the Checksums module from virt-builder mostly as it is; the only change is that on checksum mismatch an exception is raised rather than invoking "error" directly: this way users of verify_checksum & verify_checksums can do their own handling of the situation. --- builder/Makefile.am | 2 -- builder/builder.ml | 6 +++++- builder/checksums.ml | 57

Hi, this small series moves the OCaml Checksums module from virt-builder to mllib, adding more features to use it also for v2v. Thanks, Pino Toscano (4): mllib: move Checksums from builder mllib, builder: add and use Checksums.of_string mllib: add SHA1 support in Checksums v2v: -i ova: use Checksums builder/Makefile.am | 2 -- builder/builder.ml | 6 +++-

Wrap "copy/nbd-ops.c" at 80 characters. I couldn't find a way to test that this change is unobservable. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172516 Acked-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com> --- Notes: v2: - pick up Rich's ACK copy/nbd-ops.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4

Extend Index_parser.entry to hold a list of checksums to validate, and validate all of them. This does change nothing currently, as only sha512 is read, while still allowing us to fetch more checksums if needed. --- builder/builder.ml | 6 +++--- builder/checksums.ml | 3 +++ builder/checksums.mli | 3 +++ builder/index_parser.ml | 22 +++++++++++++++-------

I thought I had Dovecot configured to use Maildir instead of mbox, but apparently it is still using mbox. Excerpt from dovecot.conf: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir Excerpt from sendmail.mc: MAILER(dovecot)dnl dovecot.m4: ######################################## ### DOVECOT Mailer Specification ### ######################################## Mdovecot,

...ma= p for client and unicode=5Fmap for server and to base letter transcription= s between client and server trought Unicode ? Or is it possible to force value Client -> Server and Server -> Client ? Thank you Jacques note: when characters match between cp1252 and ISO8859-15 files, Unicode e= ntries match too. --=====================_1042820539=_ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diff_8859_15cp1252.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =23Based on iso8859-15 and cp1252 character text from: ftp://ftp.unicode.= org/Public/MAPPINGS/ =2...

Hi, I'm hopping you can give me some advice, I work for a Financial Institute and we are very interested in implementing Samba as a file server running on AIX 5.3. Before we can think about implementing this we need to no if Samba has any limitation on number of folders, files and shares. The current file storage system is running on Windows 2003 server and has somewhere in the region of