search for: ntpl

...hen falls me into repair mode. In the repair mode I can mount it manually without any problems. More interesting are: 1) I have several partitions specified with "LABEL=*" in /etc/fstab, but FC1 always can not identify same partition even on different machines; 2) the default&upgraded ntpl kernel boots up without problems. My fstab is attached below: LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/0 /0 ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/hdc1 /1 ext3 defaults 1 2 LABEL=/...

This is a cross post to <xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> and <user- mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net> Dear lists, Anybody successfully running cyrus-imapd in FC2/3+Xen/UML? When i tried to run cyrus-imapd in a virtual FC3 (Xen or UML) i got lot''s of DBERROR db4: Berkeley DB library configured to support only DB_PRIVATE environments DBERROR:

Good afternoon: I need if they can help me I have 2 Servants with Fedora Core 1 Kernel-2.4.22-1.2197.ntpl, with the following packages Openswan: Kernel-modulate-openswan-2.4.22-1.2197.ntpl-2.1.4-fc1.dag.i686.rpm and the Openswan-utils-2.1.4-1.fc1.dag.i686.rpm. As Firewall I have the shorewall 2.1 All this works well when having alone an In-date IP. When having 2 In-date IP, one to leave to Internet a...

Kernel 2.6.15-gentoo-r7 (2.6.15.7) glibc 2.3.6 (NTPL/NTPL only) Build error in server/mailslot.c: mailslot.c: In function 'mailslot_next_msg_size': mailslot.c:221: error: 'uint32_t' undeclared (first use in this function) mailslot.c:221: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mailslot.c:221: error: for each function...

According to the man pages for sem_wait, etc., POSIX semaphores are available in Linux 2.6 (with the right NTPL threading in glibc). However, I have a program that compiles just fine but won't link because it can't find the library for the semaphore operations. What am I missing? I ran a find and grep through all the libc's on the system and they turned up nothing: $ find /lib /usr/lib -name...

Is there a method to get a 586 (i586 text) install to a 486 level? I am looking for information guidance on this. I have looked into using debian/386 which stinks in my opinion, slackware doesnt quite have it either. So I am wishing/hoping there is a NOT TO painful way to get a 586 install to run on a 486 chip. I have been searching but havent found anything useful. If anyone knows what might

...mandrake rpm just doesn't come with the debugger. I have had this problem before on installs with a debugger, and I wasn't able to do much useful with that either. As I have seen in another post, even winecfg can cause this unhandled exception. Is this a known bug/remaining issues with NTPL? I'd really like to get some wine apps going...

What are the odds of success for putting the latest 2.4 kernel(2.4.34.4) from kernel.org onto a CentOS 3.x machine? -Mark

Hi all, I have built a test version of the glibc with a xen flavour. It is available on http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/xen/ . The only difference with the version currently in sid is the presence of the libc6-xen package. If you are using xen, please test it and tell me if it fixes speed problems. If everything is ok, I will commit it into our SVN. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`.

Hi all, I've just updated my system from Mandrake 10.1 to 10.2 (Mandriva 2005 LE) with kernel 2.6.11-12mdk and most apps that worked before don't work now. I've tried different versions of wine, both RPM and source code, the one I used before (20050111), the one that is supplied with the distribution and the latest RPM from SourceForge. The following is a typical example of the

...same in every linux distro. So if you > > have problems with RH you''ll have problems with debian unstable, i686 > > and a 2.6 kernel (read below for explanation), etc... > > > > /lib/ld.so checks `uname` in 2.4 kernels. If extraversion begins with > > "-ntpl" than this 2.4 kernel has nptl support. If extraversion doesn''t > > have that string it''s assumed that the kernel doesn''t have nptl support > > (and tls support). > > > > If the kernel is 2.6+ then ld.so assumes that nptl support is present....

Hi folks: I've recently migrated one of my production servers (bad Jason!) from WBEL to CentOS 3.3 using Donavan's instructions in the FAQ (http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=19). While it was as painless as the document suggests, I've run into problems with postgrey (a postfix greylisting daemon) on my server. Whenever I try to start postgrey, I get the

...ABEL=*"partitions Hi, On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 07:36, Guolin Cheng wrote: > FC1 stops on partitions "LABEL=/var" on two machines, stops on > partition "LABEL=/" on the 3rd machine. When it "stops", what error does it show? > While the default|upgraded NTPL kernel (with SMP problem) boots > without a glitch, my vanilla 2.4.25 kernel plus libata patch > 2.4.25-libata8 fails with the above symptoms described. What happens without the libata patch? > The solution to fix it is: manually run "e2fsck -y -f /dev/hd?, > tune2fs -j /dev/h...

>>> Hi all >>> >>> Thanks to Milan I am able to get further with xen and reiser4 >>> >>> - In swap line 6 and 7 status_flags.c >>> >>> #include <linux/bio.h> >>> #include <linux/page-flags.h> >>> >>> >>> - PACKED is redefined, but the definitions are the same, so the gcc >>>

...I never said so and I have been _very_critical_ of Red Hat no longer using revisions to tell us that its either a major shift (.0) or an evolutionary update (.1, .2, etc...). And this was _before_ evne Fedora Core. Red Hat should have called Red Hat Linux 9 as Red Hat Linux 8.1. Yes, they added NTPL, but there have always been a few changes from a .0 to a .1 as things are more finalized. Every .0 revision has made some poor considerations in a few regards, and after the "early adopters" start using it, they are exposed. The reality is that most things are _not_ exposed _until_ peop...