search for: ntlmssp_negotiate

...p without entering a user/pass. More precisely: If you try to connect manually to \\IP it says "Username or password incorrect" and prompts to enter a username/password. Despite the server setting to map all users to guest (see further down). I did a packet dump and the client pc asks NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE, server replies with an NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE and then the client pc simply hangs up (TCP RST). Now the (more) interesting bit: all this only happens when you use a "microsoft account", not if you use a local account. With a local account on the laptop start -> run -> \\IP will get...

...g a user/pass. More > precisely: If you try to connect manually to \\IP it says "Username > or password incorrect" and prompts to enter a username/password. > Despite the server setting to map all users to guest (see further > down). I did a packet dump and the client pc asks NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE, > server replies with an NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE and then the client pc > simply hangs up (TCP RST). > > Now the (more) interesting bit: all this only happens when you use a > "microsoft account", not if you use a local account. With a local > account on the laptop start -...

...Fedora 11 and I'm getting huge delays when first accessing a folder. With Fedora 11 I'm ussing samba-3.3.2-0.33.fc11.i586. I'm getting about 60+ second delays before being requested to enter my username/password. I've used WireShark and can see 1) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 2) 20 seconds pass 3) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC 4) 20 seconds passes 5) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC 6) again, 20 sec 7) Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: xxx/yyy from my PC Then it asks me for username/pa...

...the end of this mail, but when FOOBAR\USUARIO1 tries to access shares available on LAPAZ\COMP1 using windows explorer, it hungs forever. Doing some packet capture with wireshark I got these results: 249 15.610519 192.168.1.101 192.168.10.100 SMB 260 Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 250 15.610866 192.168.10.100 192.168.1.101 SMB 291 Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 251 15.611490 192.168.1.101 192.168.10.100 SMB 400 Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: FOOBAR\usuario1 252 15....

...ing file transfer to Windows 2008 Server Clusters. The error occurs when the printer attempts to locate the file path and uses the server IP address rather than the hostname: ====================================================== 18 21.335677 13.121.8.162 13.121.8.3 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 19 21.337175 13.121.8.3 13.121.8.162 SMB Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 20 21.349010 13.121.8.162 13.121.8.3 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: rasta-man\earl 21 21.354123 13.121.8.3 13.121.8.162 SMB Session Setup AndX Respons...

...s are in 4K blocks(Read AndX Request/Response). If I connect using root or testuser(which is in the admin users), I get 50MB/s and samba goes up to 60KB blocks when reading. Also during the negotiation, I can clearly see that "Max Buffer: 0" is set in the "Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE sent by the client, while this is 16644 when connecting as root/testuser. When switching to "security = share" and using guest access, I can see the same behaviour. Setting force user/group to root gives good performance, setting it to something else kills performance. Is this expected,...

....0.7-2.FC2 nautilus-2.6.0-4 gnome-vfs2-smb-2.6.0-8 gnome-vfs2-2.6.0-8 gnome-vfs2-devel-2.6.0-8 In looking at an ethereal trace I see some NBNS messages folloed by 3 TCP messages and 2 SMB Netgotiate Protcol Request/Response, all of which look OK. Then comes a "session setup andx request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE" message. In this message is a "Security Blob" section and part of this is "Calling workstation domain". This is set to WORKGROUP which is wrong for me and does not match what I have set in my smb.conf file. There is also a "session setup andx request, NTLMSSP_...

...8.36.146.4 SMB Negotiate Protocol Request 0.005804 158.36.146.4 -> 158.36.98.105 TCP microsoft-ds > 1042 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=138 Win=5840 Len=0 0.032163 158.36.146.4 -> 158.36.98.105 SMB Negotiate Protocol Response 0.033356 158.36.98.105 -> 158.36.146.4 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 0.042391 158.36.146.4 -> 158.36.98.105 SMB Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 0.043079 158.36.98.105 -> 158.36.146.4 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH 0.082958 158.36.146.4 -> 158.36.98.105 TCP microsoft-ds > 1042 [ACK...

...ead AndX Request/Response). If I connect using root or > testuser(which is in the admin users), I get 50MB/s and samba goes up to > 60KB blocks when reading. Also during the negotiation, I can clearly see > that "Max Buffer: 0" is set in the "Session Setup AndX Request, > NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE sent by the client, while this is 16644 when connecting > as root/testuser. > When switching to "security = share" and using guest access, I can see the > same behaviour. Setting force user/group to root gives good performance, > setting it to something else kills performance....

...b. failed read: -> Read AndX Request, FID: 0x13a2, 227 bytes at offset 0 <- Read AndX Response, FID: 0x13a2, 227 bytes This response is "NT Status: STATUS_SUCCESS" and the data is there in this response packet. -> Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE <- Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED -> Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: \ <- Session Setup AndX Response -> Tree Connect AndX Request, Path: \\HESTIA\HESTIAROOT...

...000000 Eastern Daylight Time Server Time Zone: 240 min from UTC Key Length: 8 Byte Count (BCC): 26 Encryption Key: 09cc5aa135fac1f2 Primary Domain: RAINTREE No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 7 19:12:25.741633000 192.168.11.91 192.168.11.1 SMB 192 Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE Frame 7: 192 bytes on wire (1536 bits), 192 bytes captured (1536 bits) on interface 0 Ethernet II, Src: EastmanK_2e:5f:f0 (00:07:5c:2e:5f:f0), Dst: AsustekC_be:14:60 (08:60:6e:be:14:60) Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.11.91 (192.168.11.91), Dst: 192.168.11.1 (192.168.11.1) Transmissi...

...onse 10.844932 192.168.97.2 -> 192.168.97.5 SMB Trans2 Request, GET_DFS_REFERRAL, File: \192.168.97.5\global-share 10.844993 192.168.97.5 -> 192.168.97.2 SMB Trans2 Response, GET_DFS_REFERRAL, Error: STATUS_NOT_FOUND 10.849712 192.168.97.2 -> 192.168.97.5 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 10.849800 192.168.97.5 -> 192.168.97.2 SMB Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 10.849969 192.168.97.2 -> 192.168.97.5 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: TESTDOMAIN\testuser 10.853302 192.168.97.5 -> 192.168.97.2 SMB Ses...

...223 or 1222. Connecting to XP-Clients via WLAN is okay. Connecting to Samba Wireshark tells me: malformed packet: No. ? ? Time ? ? ? ?Source ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Destination ? ? ? ? ? Protocol Info ? ? ?30 34.499685 ? 10.0.0.245 ? ? ? ? ? ?10.0.0.247 ? ? ? ? ? ?SMB ? ? ? Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE[Malformed Packet] The PDA is 10.0.0.245 the server is 10.0.0.247 Any clue, what is going wrong and what to do about it? Thank you and regards Bernd Kloss No. ? ? Time ? ? ? ?Source ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Destination ? ? ? ? ? Protocol Info ? ? ? 1 0.000000 ? ?10.0.0.248 ? ? ? ? ? ?10.0.0.247 ? ? ? ?...

...ing uses: SMB Open Print File Request brochure printing starts with: SPOOLSS OpenPrinterEx request I recorded the network transmission during printing and received the following for brochure printing (which fails): Source Dest Protocol Info client server SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE server client SMB Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED client server SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: \ server client SMB Session Setup AndX Response client server SMB Tree Connect AndX Request, Path: \...

...192.168.16.33 20 29.808240 192.168.17.25 192.168.16.33 ICMP Echo (ping) request 21 29.809174 192.168.16.33 192.168.17.25 ICMP Echo (ping) reply 22 29.820861 192.168.17.25 192.168.16.33 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 23 29.822494 192.168.16.33 192.168.17.25 SMB Session Setup AndX Response, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 24 29.822896 192.168.17.25 192.168.16.33 SMB Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: MYDOMAIN\root...

...ers=2.1 If I do so I can see this in tcpdump: 100.392000390 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 172 Negotiate Protocol Request 100.393121936 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 318 Negotiate Protocol Response 100.393223968 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 190 Session Setup Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE 100.394178092 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 390 Session Setup Response, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE 100.394295512 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 494 Session Setup Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: OFFICE\c.garling 100.397795864 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168....

...2.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Client started (version 3.0.30-0.fc8). Connecting to 192.168.1.147 at port 445 session request ok Password: Doing spnego session setup (blob length=46) got OID=1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 got principal=<null> Got challenge flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x628a8215 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_ALWAYS_SIGN NTLMSSP_CHAL_ACCEPT_RESPONSE NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP_CHAL_TARGET_INFO NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_KEY_EXCH NTLMSSP: Set final flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags...