search for: ntlm2

...nning after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. My log.samba file is full of the following; I'm not certain of the significance of these. [2012/12/17 05:59:09, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 06:35:30, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 06:55:58, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet chec...

...a 4 version 4.3.0, running since August, do not is a problem, but my i see this messages logs every 1 minutes, any ideas? Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: [2015/12/07 10:40:24.260707, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: [2015/12/07 10:40:24.280740, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! Thanks!

...etz, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos A. P. >> Cunha >> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid >> signature >> >> Hi! >> any ideas? >> >> >> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >>> HI! >>> My server Samba 4 version 4.3.0, running since August, do not is a >>> problem, but my...

...one have any idea what it is? *Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM <http://XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM> samba[14480]: [2018/05/14 08:54:47.676288, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet)* *Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXXXX.XXXXXXX.COM <http://XXXXXXX.XXXXXXX.COM> samba[14480]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature!* *Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXX.XXXXX.COM <http://XXXXX.XXXXX.COM> samba[14481]: [2018/05/14 08:54:47.712476, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet)* *Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXX.XXXXX.COM <http://XXXXX.XXXXX.COM> samba[14481]: NTLM...

...-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>>> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos A. P. >>>> Cunha >>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>> invalid >>>> signature >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> any ideas? >>>> >>>> >>>> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >>>>> HI! >>>>> My ser...

...ba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos >>>>>> A. P. >>>>>> Cunha >>>>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>>>> invalid >>>>>> signature >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> any ideas? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha...

...t;> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos A. P. >>> Cunha >>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid >>> signature >>> >>> Hi! >>> any ideas? >>> >>> >>> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >>>> HI! >>>> My server Samba 4 version 4.3.0, running since August, do no...

...bericht----- >>>>> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos A. P. >>>>> Cunha >>>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>>> invalid >>>>> signature >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> any ideas? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >>>>>&...

...unces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos >>>>>>> A. P. >>>>>>> Cunha >>>>>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>>>>> invalid >>>>>>> signature >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>> any ideas? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em 07-1...

....org] Namens Carlos >>>>>>>> A. P. >>>>>>>> Cunha >>>>>>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>>>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>>>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>>>>>> invalid >>>>>>>> signature >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>> any ideas? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>...

...>>>>> A. P. >>>>>>>>>> Cunha >>>>>>>>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>>>>>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>>>>>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>>>>>>>> invalid >>>>>>>>>> signature >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>>>> any ideas? >>>>>>>>&g...

Hi, this patch fixes endianness problem in NTLM2 code. Please consider applying. Best regards. -- Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net -------------- next part -------------- diff -u dovecot-1.0-test46/src/auth/mech-ntlm.c dovecot-1.0-test46/src/auth/mech-ntlm.c --- dovecot-1.0-test...

Hello, as pointed by Andrew Bartlett NTLM2 authentication support is missing in dovecot. Attached patch adds it. Tested and works for me. Please consider applying. Best regards. -- Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net -------------- next part -------------- diff -urpNX /usr/s...

...56:10, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:237(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) Failed to modify SPNs on CN=W2000,CN=Computers,DC=xxx,DC=lan: error in module acl: insufficient access rights (50) [2012/11/18 14:56:19, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/11/18 15:04:41, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/11/18 15:07:05, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:237(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) F...

...I want restart winbind service because the users are not autenticate anymore. This is the error into log file: > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]: [2016/02/04 10:15:26.529467,  0] > ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]:  NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check > failed due to invalid signature! > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]: [2016/02/04 10:15:26.539866,  0] > ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]:  NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check > failed due to invalid signature! &gt...

Hi all, I've been running Samba 4.1.6 in production for 2 weeks now and it's been great. However I noticed a huge security flaw today that I hit only once. I access Samba4 shares over the VPN that is irrelevant since the security access is user-based, not IP based. What happens right after the connection, Windows tries to read the shares and some are empty, but they are not supposed to

...password interface [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 3] auth/auth.c:225(check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [GRANSAPORE]\[thiago.ferreira]@[TI-09] [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 10] auth/auth.c:234(check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: auth_context challenge created by NTLMSSP callback (NTLM2) [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 10] auth/auth.c:236(check_ntlm_password) challenge is: [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/07/08 13:...

Hi, I run Samba 4.2.3 on a fileserver since 2015 without any problem even if in the log file I read "NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature" several times a day. In my network are presents windows 7, 10, and some old XP machine. Yesterday evening, for the very first time, my server chrashes and I have to restart it. The samba error reported is: internal error: signal 11 in PID 1280...

...unfortunally samba denies access: <snip filename="log.smbd"> [2005/10/06 14:46:22, 0] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(557) No protocol supported ! </snip> in smb.conf we'd defined the max protocol as LANMAN2 on the printer we've tested following options: LM/NTLM NTLM NTLM2 allways the same message. samba version: 3.0.11 can somebody help / has somebody experiences? thx in adv kurt

Hello to all, my name is Alejandro and I have a little question to anyone of this list. I?ve created ,6 years ago, an ldap+smb proyect for a big company. Back then, samba (Lenny server) only worked with NT hashes but now (Squeeze server) they want to authenticate with Win7 (ntlm2 protocols) And configurating windows7 to accept old NT hashes is not an exit. I want to update ONLY the smb package from samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny15) to samba (2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze8). PD: I'm using an OLD and modified by myself openldap version so i cant touch it. My question is this: Have s...