search for: ntdomains

> > I love diving : ) > Ok mathias, Can you explain this. This i dont get.... Why is this output so different, and i dont mean the difference with NTDOMAIN\.. See the groups differences... between a ADDC and a member server.. Samba 4.4.3 ADDC id someusername uid=10002(NTDOMAIN\someusername) gid=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain users) groups=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain

Hi Rowland, Yes, thats done, the domain user exist on both servers in local sudo group. But why do i see much more groups on the ADDC, and even groups where this user is NOT member of, like 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group). See .. 2x 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group Greetz, Louis >

And dont forget : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read on.. NTDOMAIN\enterprise read-only domain controllers:x:3000202: NTDOMAIN\domain admins:x:10001:NTDOMAIN\administrator NTDOMAIN\domain users:x:10000: NTDOMAIN\domain guests:x:10002:

On 22/06/16 13:44, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 6/22/2016 8:19 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> And dont forget : >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad >> >> I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights >> issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read >> on.. >> >>

It appears that you cannot include groups from trusted domains in the 'valid users =' directive on a share. Here is the scenario as I experienced it (names have been changed to protect the innocent): Configuration: - Samba 3.0.21b as a member server in a real NT4 domain (security = domain) called 'NTDOMAIN' - NTDOMAIN has a two-way trust with Windows 2003 Active Directory

Hi Heinz, Baris wrote me the following: > i'm using samba4 and RDP running.... > my configuration: > > smb.conf > > .. > auth methods = sam, winbind, ntdomain, ntdomain:winbind > server services = s3fs, winbind, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap, kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon,

On 6/22/2016 8:19 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > And dont forget : > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad > > I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read on.. > > NTDOMAIN\enterprise read-only domain controllers:x:3000202: > NTDOMAIN\domain

can you try : smbclient //SERVER.DOMAIN.TLD/netlogon -k bet that works.. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: heinz.hoelzl at gvcc.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Heinz H?lzl >Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 10:55 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >CC: pug at felsing.net; schnaggy at schnaggy.de >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba 4.2 RDP

On 22/06/16 10:13, mj wrote: > > > On 06/21/2016 04:48 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> >> I found my issue. On one of my DC's I had misspelled 'idmap_ldb:use >> rfc2307 = Yes'. I had it 'idmap_lbd:'. Ran 'net cache flush' and wbinfo >> gave correct mappings. I find it odd that 'samba-tool testparm' never >> threw

And what i dont see,, what is your "current" smb.conf ? Greetz. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > lingpanda101 at gmail.com > Verzonden: woensdag 22 juni 2016 15:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Rights issue on GPO > > On 6/22/2016 8:51 AM, Rowland penny wrote:

Hello, I'm trying to query one of my remote domains for users via "wbinfo -u --domain=EUROPE" and receiving "Error looking up domain users". I have been successfully able to look up users in multiple domains i.e. "wbinfo -u --domain=UK". My current domain is called NTDOMAIN in which I have my Ubuntu Dapper (6.06) box, running winbind 3.0.22-1ubuntu3.1 and

>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad Dont we need idmap config in the smb.conf also, or is above not used anymore, if so the we must change the wiki. Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > lingpanda101 at gmail.com > Verzonden: woensdag 22 juni 2016 15:37 > Aan: samba at

hi, now i did some tests with the "auth methods" option. "auth methods = sam, sam_ignoredomain, unix, winbind, wbc, trustdomain, ntdomain, guest" -> RDP works -> smbclient -k does not work "auth methods = sam, sam_ignoredomain, unix, winbind, wbc, trustdomain, ntdomain, guest, samba4" -> RDP hangs an the welcome-scrren -> smbclient -k works fine

27.06.2016 18:45, mathias dufresne: > Perhaps you don't have yet duplicate objectSid as that's not supposed to be > possible. > Rather than scripting something to look for objectSid used twice I would > start with dbcheck and other tools to verify that your database is > consistent and identical on all servers. [root at pdc ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 3346 objects

I have a Samba server here with 4 users and 4 XP systems. Kind of small, but it does the job. It is running as a PDC with roaming profiles. I should note that I left professionally supporting Windows networking around the time XP came out, so I have maintained an NTDomain through a number of incarnations (NT, Win2000, Samba2/3) and use of someone elses packaging. This time I want to use

Hello group. Sorry, if this shows twice. I have the following setup requirement, and so far searching the INET and the mailing archives has brought me nothing. I have an existing WindosNT/2k/XP domain. I need to share a directory on a Slackware 9.0 (recent samba). I need the users authenticated to the Windows Domain, but all then mapped to nobody (i.e. I do NOT want to map windows

Hi, I have deployed a new file server (Samba version 4.6.2, CentOS 7) which is running as a member of an AD domain (The DCs are both Windows server 2012, forest and domain level is 2012 as well). I'm using the AD backend to store SID/UID mappings. So everything is working fine except for one specific user on one specific workstation (Windows 10) who can only access the file server with

Lets see. So are you going to be getting rid of the NT Domain? If not, why not just setup LDAP authentication on the linux box through PAM with the help of a few other modules. It creates a local account based on the authentication success. Works great for me. This also promotes centralized user administration. Is that what you are going after? If not, I apologize for giving you the wrong

Ok. I've done the following, any samba dev, please read below. Looks to me some bug in librpc/ndr/ndr.c But im not a coder.. so please have a look.     Environment. Debian Jessie, samba 4.2.10 (debian)   I remove my proxy2 server from the domain, cleared up the AD. Removed all content from /var/(lib/cache)/samba Removed all other unnneeded services for this test. Removed all

New Polices created Denver policy is 1684 Atlanta Policy is 1441 IP address added 10.80.13.163 - this is allowed only to ATM services Jason Prouty CCT Manager Network Engineering 303-928-1588 Desk 720-412-1942 Cell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davide Ianni via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: samba at lists.samba.org Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018