search for: nt_errstr

..."%s authentication for user [%s\\%s] " > "FAILED with error %s\n", > (state->method ? state->method->ops->name : "NO_METHOD"), > state->user_info->mapped.domain_name, > state->user_info->mapped.account_name, > nt_errstr(status))); > tevent_req_received(req); > return status; > } to: > if (tevent_req_is_nterror(req, &status)) { > DEBUG(2,("auth_check_password_recv: " > "%s authentication for user [%s\\%s] on host %s " > "FAILED with error %s\n&quot...

...n () Look at the code in rpc_trustdom_establish() call in utils/net_rpc.c. nt_status = connect_to_ipc_anonymous(&cli, &server_ip, (char*)pdc_name); if (NT_STATUS_IS_ERR(nt_status)) { DEBUG(0, ("Couldn't connect to domain %s controller. Error was %s.\n", domain_name, nt_errstr(nt_status))); } /* * Use NetServerEnum2 to make sure we're talking to a proper server */ if (!cli_get_pdc_name(cli, domain_name, (char*)pdc_name)) { DEBUG(0, ("NetServerEnum2 error: Couldn't find primary domain controller\ for domain %s\n", domain_name)); } Duri...

...ally an error or not. Any reason why some of the error outputs are not sent out over stderr? As an example, in the torture_open_connection_share method in the torture/util_smb.c file, the following line prints the error to stdout: printf("Failed to open connection - %s\n", nt_errstr(status)); I noticed a few others that were doing the same thing. I was expecting to see fprintf (stderr ...) for these kinds of messages. Thanks, Stan

...(!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { 769 DEBUG(10, ("get_nt_acl_internal: get_next_acl for file %s " 770 "returned %s\n", 771 smb_fname->base_name, 772 nt_errstr(status))); 773 goto fail; 784 if (memcmp(&hash[0], &hash_tmp[0], XATTR_SD_HASH_SIZE) == 0) { 785 /* Hash matches, return blob sd. */ 786 DEBUG(10, ("get_nt_acl_internal: blob hash " 787...

..."FAILED with error %s\n", >> (state->method ? state->method->ops->name : "NO_METHOD"), >> state->user_info->mapped.domain_name, >> state->user_info->mapped.account_name, >> nt_errstr(status))); >> tevent_req_received(req); >> return status; >> } > > to: > >> if (tevent_req_is_nterror(req, &status)) { >> DEBUG(2,("auth_check_password_recv: " >> "%s authentication for user...

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

...= NULL; > bool ignore_file_system_acl = lp_parm_bool(SNUM(handle->conn), > @@ -509,25 +509,25 @@ static NTSTATUS get_nt_acl_internal(vfs_handle_struct *handle, > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > DEBUG(10, ("get_nt_acl_internal: get_acl_blob returned %s\n", > nt_errstr(status))); > - psd = NULL; > + psd_blob = NULL; > goto out; > } else { > - status = parse_acl_blob(&blob, mem_ctx, &psd, > + status = parse_acl_blob(&blob, mem_ctx, &psd_blob, > &hash_type, &xattr_version, &hash[0], &sys_acl_hash[0...

Hello all, after the upgarde from Samba 4.10.7 to 4.11.2 we get lots of these in our logfiles: 2019-11-28T20:40:44+01:00 lx-sv-09 smbd_audit: [2019/11/28 20:40:44.886615, 1] ../../source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c:597(get_share_mode_lock) 2019-11-28T20:40:44+01:00 lx-sv-09 smbd_audit: get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY There are no symptoms accept

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

Hi there, I tried to build samba 4.0.9 on a Debian Wheezy 7.1 x86 fresh install and got this error: [2717/3935] Compiling source3/smbd/scavenger.c ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c: In function ?scavenger_timer?: ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c:482:3: error: format ?%lu? expects argument of type ?long unsigned int?, but argument 3 has type ?uint64_t? [-Werror=format] ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c:490:3:

I created the well known group Domain Admins pointing to a local group, but I am not able to add users to the group -- it claims I can only add users to local or global groups... But I only see local, domain ,well-known, builtin. There are no global groups unless one would include all groups that are not local (i.e. domain, well-known, and builtin).... So why doesn't it want to let me add

...ess_mask); > + smb_dname, > + false, > + access_mask); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > DEBUG(10, ("open_directory: smbd_check_access_rights on " > - "file %s failed with %s\n", > - smb_fname_str_dbg(smb_dname), > - nt_errstr(status))); > + "file %s failed with %s\n", > + smb_fname_str_dbg(smb_dname), > + nt_errstr(status))); > return status; > } > } > - > + > status = file_new(req, conn, &fsp); > if(!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > return st...

...? uint32_t num_domains = 0; ??? ??? NTSTATUS status; ??? ??? if (lp_server_role() == ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) { ??? ??? ??? status = NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS; ??? ??? ??? DBG_ERR("winbindd not running - " ??? ??? ??? ??? "but required as domain member: %s\n", ??? ??? ??? ??? nt_errstr(status)); ??? ??? ??? return status; ??? ??? } So your server doesn't seem to be able to find winbindd, are you sure it is running ? What does this show: ps ax | grep '[w]inbind' What OS is this ? Rowland

...static_share_mode_data( ??? ??? ??? static_share_mode_record, ??? ??? ??? id, ??? ??? ??? servicepath, ??? ??? ??? smb_fname, ??? ??? ??? old_write_time); ??? ??? if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { ??? ??? ??? DBG_WARNING("get_static_share_mode_data failed: %s\n", ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? nt_errstr(status)); ??? ??? ??? goto fail; ??? ??? } It calls 'get_static_share_mode_data' and the relevant part of that is this: ??? if (value.dptr == NULL) { ??? ??? d = fresh_share_mode_lock( ??? ??? ??? lock_db, servicepath, smb_fname, old_write_time); ??? ??? if (d == NULL) { ??? ??? ??...

...? static_share_mode_record, > ??? ??? ??? id, > ??? ??? ??? servicepath, > ??? ??? ??? smb_fname, > ??? ??? ??? old_write_time); > ??? ??? if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > ??? ??? ??? DBG_WARNING("get_static_share_mode_data failed: %s\n", > ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? nt_errstr(status)); > ??? ??? ??? goto fail; > ??? ??? } > > It calls 'get_static_share_mode_data' and the relevant part > of that is this: > > ??? if (value.dptr == NULL) { > ??? ??? d = fresh_share_mode_lock( > ??? ??? ??? lock_db, servicepath, smb_fname, old_writ...

We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote the attached patch. > > We got the logs by forcing smbd to run with -d10 by patching > file_server/fileserver.c. The issue appears to be in this call: 3638 /* Ensure there was no race condition. */ 3639 if (!check_same_stat(&smb_dname->st, &fsp->fsp_name->st)) { 3640

...2F1B9' /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so: undefined reference to `rep_strlcpy at SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_GIT_092F1B9' /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so: undefined reference to `swrap_connect at SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_GIT_092F1B9' /usr/local/samba/lib/libndr.so: undefined reference to `nt_errstr at SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_GIT_092F1B9' /usr/local/samba/lib/libndr-standard.so: undefined reference to `ndr_pull_kerb_EncTypes at SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_GIT_092F1B9' /usr/local/samba/lib/libndr-standard.so: undefined reference to `ndr_pull_security_secinfo at SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_GIT_092F1B9' /...

Hi Viktor! Thanks for your try at this, I am already doing what you suggest: the iptables - timestaps. But that is rather troublesome, and I would very much samba to log this vital info. Anyway, I tried what you suggested, and now it stopped compiling. :-) Does this error perhaps tell you something, or are you just as clueless as I am now: > [1955/4033] Compiling source4/auth/ntlm/auth.c

Hi Rowland, > Remove 'map untrusted to domain = Yes', it has been removed. > > Add 'domain logons = Yes' > > This gets it back to being a PDC: thanks for the hints! I did that, but it doesn't help. I guess the problem is not on the PDC server but on SERVER2. That's the one that got upgraded and stopped working (even with the non-pdc config of SERVER1). I

Is behavior of ACLs under Samba 3.3.0 (Sernet) completely different from that under version 3.2.7? The release notes only talks about some "fixes". I installed version 3.3.0 and got completely different result with the same filesystem and the exact same samba configuration. The ACLs behaved strangely and appeared very different under Windows ACL editor. Users were now unable to