Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "nt4tse".
2004 Apr 28
0
FW: Re: md5 fail on large file
Me again. I think I have found which is the problem.
After I have copied the file from NT4TSE to samba, I have run
df on the filesystem, and the used space was minor than the
filesize printed by ls -l
ls -l priv.edb
-rwxr--r-- 1 user group 5393883136 Apr 28 10:58 priv.edb
du priv.edb
4194364 priv.edb
df
df /dev/hda8 99396660 41994828 95201832 5% /mnt/data
My env: linux-2.4.26. /de...
2004 Apr 09
1
md5 fail on large file
Hello everybody.
I'm experimenting this problem with samba 3.0.2a and linux 2.4.25 with ReiserFS.
When I copy (put) a large file (5GB) from a Windows NT terminal server sp6a to the samba-linux box, the md5sum is different between the two file. Files size are identical.
I'm using this command to copy these files from windows to samba:
xcopy f:\ \\mimas\backup\exchange /e /c /h /r
I have
2004 Apr 15
0
How to reduce the memory used by Samba and its connection ?
...il.com (Marco Berizzi)
Date: Thu Apr 15 13:20:19 2004
Subject: [Samba] Fw: md5 fail on large file
Message-ID: <Sea2-DAV63HZOzTBoLI000250bc@hotmail.com>
Me again. I have upgraded to linux kernel
2.6.5. However this problem hasn't gone away.
The md5 check is fine, coping the same file
from NT4TSE to a Windoze 2000sp4.
Coping the same file from a windoze 2000sp4
to the samba share is ok. So the problem is
between NT4TSE and samba.
NT4TSE --> SAMBA = KO
WIN2k --> SAMBA = OK
NT4TSE --> WIN2K = OK
Can anybody help me?
Marco Berizzi wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I'm...
2004 May 17
3
wrong file size
I'm having a problem coping a 5GB file from
Windows NT 4 TSE to samba 3.0.4
This is the output from stat on this file:
File: `priv.edb'
Size: 5393883136 Blocks: 8388728 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 308h/776d Inode: 9 Links: 1
Access: (0744/-rwxr--r--) Uid: (10000/DOMAIN\!schedule) Gid: (10000/DOMAIN\Domain Users)
Access: 2004-05-17 10:07:22.000000000
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...t;mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Is there an equivalent registry hack needed in Win2000 with terminal
services to the one in samba-2.2.1a/docs/WindowsTerminalServer.reg (from
the sources)?
It sets the following in NT4TSE
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters]
"MultipleUsersOnConnection"=dword:00000000
Win 2000 doesn't have this registry key.
We're seeing problems with shares becoming inaccessible when using any
samba 2.2.* It happens, but less often under 2.0.7
S...