search for: nsupdate

.../samba4/private/named.conf for an example configuration include file for BIND and /var/db/samba4/private/named.txt for further documentation required for secure DNS updates Finished upgrading DNS root at mtm:/var/named/etc/namedb # When I run the command root at mtm:/var/named/etc/namedb # samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I got lots of errors: IPs: ['192.168.0.202'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN} ${HOSTNAME} 389) as we are not a PDC Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST} ${HOSTNAME} 389) as we are not a PDC Calling nsupdate for A loca...

I have a dc configured to use the samba internal dns service. The version of samba I am using is 4.10.15 packaged for FreeBSD. Its build options state this: BIND911 : off BIND916 : off , , , GSSAPI_BUILTIN : on GSSAPI_MIT : off LDAP : on . . . NSUPDATE : off My smb4.conf file contains this: [global] bind interfaces only = Yes dns forwarder = 192.168.18.161 216.185.71.33 interfaces = lo0 localhost smb4-1 netbios name = SMB4-1 realm = BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = BROCKLEY...

> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does > freebsd call it smb4.conf ?), Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have answers that are not worth the effort to know. > try: > nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate does not give any evidence of using any value set by 'dns update command = '. It always reports that it cannot find '/usr/bin/nsupdate'. [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]...

Hi all I have configured domain controler in debian 9 (samba 4.5.12-Debian). Dns is internal samba. locally works well (I think) but from another computer I can not query DNS. The problem is with samba_dnsupdate My configuration: smb.conf # Global parameters [global]     netbios name = DC     realm = BEWPHOTO.LOCAL     workgroup = BEWPHOTO     dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8     server role = active directory domain controller     #allow dns updates = nosecure [netlogon]     path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/bewphot...

...o/2016/02/17/step-by-step-removing-a-domain-controller-server-manually/ to remove *samba4bkp* manually. After remove *samba4bkp, *I've checked *samba4* dns zones and they are ok, but *king *still has maintained *samba4bkp* registers. Then I've tried to update dns entries running *samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names* and it has returned that all 28 entries failed to updated, as shown below. I've searched about similar error "; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure", but I've been unsuccessful. Regards! -- Igor Sousa *samba_dnsupdate output:* [root at king ~]# s...

...Server DNS name : QC2NDOHUS2B.dncom.de Server DN name : CN=NTDS Settings,CN=QC2NDOHUS2B,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dncom,DC=de TransportType: RPC options: 0x00000001 Warning: No NC replicated for Connection! samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names makes also problems IPs: ['fe80::20c:29ff:fe65:b90e%eth0', '172.16.128.120'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN} ${HOSTNAME} 389) as we are not a PDC Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}...

Dear all, after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain. There is an error on using, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well. [root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.135.253'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp....

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This option sets the command that is called when...

...0:23, Rowland penny wrote: (I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its mailing list and got no answer...) >> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND? > > What do you mean '*in alternative*' ?? I mean when I build Samba port, I can choose NSUPDATE *or* BIND99 *or* BIN910 (where "or" means "exclusive or", I can choose at most one). Those options are described as: BIND99 = Use bind99 as AD DC DNS server frontend BIND910 = Use bind910 as AD DC DNS server frontend NSUPDATE = Use samba NSUPDATE utility for AD DC Notice this...

...a/sysvol/ry11cit.local/scripts     read only = No [sysvol]     path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol     read only = No Samba Provision---------------:     samba-tool domain provision --realm=RY11CIT.LOCAL --domain=RY11CIT --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --adminpass='.....' samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names :------------------------------------------------------------------------- Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id:      0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION: ry11citdc.ry11cit.local. 900  ...

Hi, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.1.20'] force update: A samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: NS empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: NS _msdcs.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: A empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: SRV _ldap._...

...Yes! repeated that once more now. Same result. > Hmm.. >> SOA contains "dc.mydomain.at" still .. > Change the SOA to the Other DC. ( as in, not DC, but DC2 ) edited > Verify the DNS A ptr GUID again on DC2 also. To be sure. looks good to ma > On DC run : samba_dnsupdate --verbose > Post this output. + It immediately starts to fail like: # samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['192.168.16.205'] Looking for DNS entry A dc.mydomain.at 192.168.16.205 as dc.mydomain.at. The DNS entry A dc.mydomain.at 192.168.16.205, queried as dc.mydomain.at. does not exist ne...

...https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Testing_Dynamic_DNS_Updates https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#TroubleshootingAnd tried everything possible. Writing mail to lists is the last instance for me...On every of our DCs: samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['192.168.45.1'] Looking for DNS entry A dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz 192.168.45.1 as dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz. Looking for DNS entry NS samdom.svmetal.cz dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz as samdom.svmetal.cz. Looking for DNS entry NS _msdcs.samdom.svmetal.cz dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz as _msd...

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY...

...rg/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Testing_Dynamic_DNS_Updates > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Troubl eshootingAnd tried everything possible. Writing mail to lists is > the last instance for me...On every of our DCs: > samba_dnsupdate --verbose > IPs: ['192.168.45.1'] > Looking for DNS entry A dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz 192.168.45.1 > as dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz. > Looking for DNS entry NS samdom.svmetal.cz > dc03x.samdom.svmetal.cz as samdom.svmetal.cz. > Looking for DNS entry NS _msdcs.samdom.svmetal.cz...

..."dc" was the old name a few years ago >>>>> >>>>> I try to get rid of that now. >>>>> >>>>> host -t A dc... not found. We want that in the end. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Ah, my mistake. The samba_dnsupdate script uses a file 'dns_update_list >>>> to check for records and create any missing ones, this uses >>>> '${HOSTNAME}', so it looks like somewhere 'dc' still exists. >>> definitely, see the rgrep ;-) >>> >> Rename the cache file &...

On 05/03/16 22:55, Rowland penny wrote: > Don't use freebsd, but Samba 4, when run as an AD DC, uses nsupdate to > update a computers DNS records in AD. First off, thanks for answering. Alas, I don't really understand what you mean... Is it used to dynamically add A records for clients that connect to the AD? >> Is it intended to work with BIND (like the other two in that group)? >...

...gt;> DNS entries via this script on the wiki? >>> b) set up the *new* 2nd DC on the hardware of the prior 1st DC (with >>> the same IP address)? >>> >>> >>> >> >> Possibly, but can you try this on your second DC, run >> 'samba_dnsupdate --verbose' >> >> Rowland >> > > Doesn't look too good to me: > > > [root at DC2 me]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose > IPs: ['IP_of_2nd_DC'] > Looking for DNS entry A DC2.my.domain.tld IP_of_2nd_DC as > DC2.my.domain.tld. > Looking for DNS ent...

...al dns-domain schau.local /etc/resolv.conf # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8) # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN nameserver 10.0.0.20 search schau.local when i test it with: # /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I get following error: root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['fe80::a00:27ff:fe3b:4013%eth0', '10.0.0.20'] Calling nsupdate for A schau.local 10.0.0.20 Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<-...

...>> obtain something that isn't there :-) > > That's basically what I just wrote... > >> >> See Louis's earlier post for how to attempt to fix this, but before >> you do anything, restart samba on the second DC and then check the >> logs, samba_dnsupdate should add the records you are missing. >> >> Rowland >> >> > > However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just > again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. > > If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container...