search for: nsq_del_dec_mipsr1

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "nsq_del_dec_mipsr1".

2015 Aug 05
0
[PATCH 8/8] Apply Neon short prediction optimization to silk_noise_shape_quantizer_del_dec.
--- silk/NSQ_del_dec.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------ silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c b/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c index aff560c..aaa1fca 100644 --- a/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c +++ b/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. #include "main.h" #include "stack_all...
2015 Nov 21
0
[Aarch64 v2 07/18] Apply Neon short prediction optimization to silk_noise_shape_quantizer_del_dec.
--- silk/NSQ_del_dec.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------ silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c b/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c index aff560c..aaa1fca 100644 --- a/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c +++ b/silk/NSQ_del_dec.c @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. #include "main.h" #include "stack_all...
2019 Sep 10
1
Int overflow fix not present in tree.
...is the correct thing to do, either (as opposed to, say, multiplying out by the coefficients individually). Either way, there are exact analogs of this code in NSQ.c, as well as all of the SIMD optimizations (x86/NSQ_sse4_1.c and x86/NSQ_del_dec_sse4_1.c, arm/NSQ_del_dec_neon_intr.c, and mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h). If it is a possible issue in master, the fix looks incomplete to me, at least.
2015 Dec 23
6
[AArch64 neon intrinsics v4 0/5] Rework Neon intrinsic code for Aarch64 patchset
...++++++----------- silk/NSQ.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/NSQ_del_dec.c | 40 +++++------- silk/arm/NSQ_neon.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/NSQ_neon.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 3 +- silk/x86/NSQ_sse.c | 2 +- silk/x86/main_sse.h | 3 +- silk_headers.mk | 2 + silk_sources.mk | 2 + 16 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) create mode 100644 silk/NSQ.h create mode 100644 silk/arm/NSQ_neon.c...
2015 Nov 21
12
[Aarch64 v2 00/18] Patches to enable Aarch64 (version 2)
...el_dec.c | 37 +++++------- silk/arm/NSQ_neon.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/NSQ_neon.h | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/macros_arm64.h | 39 +++++++++++++ silk/macros.h | 22 ++++--- silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 3 +- silk/x86/NSQ_sse.c | 2 +- silk/x86/main_sse.h | 3 +- silk_headers.mk | 3 + silk_sources.mk | 2 + 22 files changed, 655 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-) create mode 100644 celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h create mode 100644 silk/NSQ...
2015 Aug 05
8
[PATCH 0/8] Patches for arm64 (aarch64) support
...n.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/NSQ_neon.h | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/SigProc_FIX_arm64.h | 46 +++++++++++++++ silk/arm/macros_arm64.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++ silk/macros.h | 4 ++ silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 3 +- silk/x86/NSQ_sse.c | 2 +- silk/x86/main_sse.h | 3 +- silk_headers.mk | 4 ++ silk_sources.mk | 2 + 22 files changed, 685 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-) create mode 100644 celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h create mode 100644 silk/NS...
2015 Nov 07
12
[Aarch64 00/11] Patches to enable Aarch64 (arm64) optimizations, rebased to current master.
...n.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/NSQ_neon.h | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/SigProc_FIX_arm64.h | 46 +++++++++++++++ silk/arm/macros_arm64.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++ silk/macros.h | 4 ++ silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 3 +- silk/x86/NSQ_sse.c | 2 +- silk/x86/main_sse.h | 3 +- silk_headers.mk | 4 ++ silk_sources.mk | 2 + 23 files changed, 732 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) create mode 100644 celt/arm/fixed_arm64.h create mode 100644 silk/NSQ...
2019 Sep 10
2
Int overflow fix not present in tree.
Hi! I'm Yves, bit fiddler, hoping to roll a fresh version of libopus into chromium. This fix <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1072869/> never made it to opus repository. Was it intentional? If so, what is the rational? If not, could the fix be applied on the libopus master branch? Thanks for the amazing work! -- Warm regards, Yves -------------- next part
2016 Aug 23
0
[PATCH 8/8] Optimize silk_NSQ_del_dec() for ARM NEON
...| 4 +- silk/arm/NSQ_del_dec_arm.h | 88 ++ silk/arm/NSQ_del_dec_neon_intr.c | 1125 +++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/arm_silk_map.c | 23 + silk/main.h | 6 +- silk/mips/NSQ_del_dec_mipsr1.h | 2 +- silk/tests/test_unit_optimization_NSQ_del_dec.c | 142 +++ silk/x86/NSQ_del_dec_sse.c | 6 +- silk/x86/main_sse.h | 4 +- silk/x86/x86_silk_map.c | 2 +- silk_sources.mk...
2016 Aug 23
2
[PATCH 7/8] Update NSQ_LPC_BUF_LENGTH macro.
NSQ_LPC_BUF_LENGTH is independent of DECISION_DELAY. --- silk/define.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/silk/define.h b/silk/define.h index 781cfdc..1286048 100644 --- a/silk/define.h +++ b/silk/define.h @@ -173,11 +173,7 @@ extern "C" #define MAX_MATRIX_SIZE MAX_LPC_ORDER /* Max of LPC Order and LTP order */ -#if( MAX_LPC_ORDER >