search for: nspluginwrapp

This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error: For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer: No such file or directory Here is what I have installed: $rpm -qa | grep -i nsplugin nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-21.el5.i386 nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-21.el5.x86_64 These are now part of the base, but there seems to be a problem with finding the right plugin to execute: $ lo...

As the subject of nspluginwrapper came up recently, it might be worth mentioning that it's not properly documented. The README seems to be the official nspluginwrapper README, which, oddly enough, states that it's used with the command nspluginwrapper However, RedHat based systems seem to all use mozilla-config-plugin....

Hello everyone, I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound. Flashplayer is: flash-plugin-9.0.48.0-release.i386.rpm nspluginwrappers are: nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm nspluginwrapper-i386-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm Any help in tracking this down would be great. Thnx. -- Regards Robert Smile... it...

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Lars Hecking <lhecking at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > ?Possibly. Or possibly not. On a closely related topic, can you comment on > ?whether or not it's a good idea to install the nspluginwrapper rpms on x86_64? > ?They seem to be fundamentally broken. > I don't think you need it anymore with FF 3.6.

Hello, I just searched the wiki for info about NSPluginWrapper. It's a plugin for Firefox which creates a kind of bridge between i386-plugins and a x86_64 browser. That aside... Well, looking for the string "NSPluginWrapper" and doing a text-search, the only hit is the Japanese version of the Release Notes!? I don't understand any of t...

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0445 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0445.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9af9ec99c79f925b8968c765e97090a2 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.i386.rpm c75510fec94560c8e6437e1af0e8c73d nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: d9409719dc49d9c35b1a1a7e6fe23631 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

...build process, I was never able to build a 64-bit version of the 1.x releases, but I had no trouble running the L&G not-yet-released revision, with occasional glitches from the bugs that I ran into (and reported). But, back to the point: There are two major issues I have with the 5.2 bundled nspluginwrapper: 1) The nspluginwrapper program itself is gone, which makes it a little (lot) harder to manage and troubleshoot the problems. and, more importantly: 2) None of the 32-bit plugins that are supposed to be wrapped work. Period. Is this something I should report in bugzilla, at CentOS (and upstr...

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0445 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0445.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 685f09b105aa75596ebde5991fddbac0 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.i386.rpm Source: d9409719dc49d9c35b1a1a7e6fe23631 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than centos. Manual installation of affected rpms using --nodeps (I don't advise this) did not apear to impair the performance of any of the affected packages. Is everyone seeing this...

...ran.Org-EL5 - Stable Finished 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:1.9.0.1-1.el5_2 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9 for package: nspluginwrapper --> Processing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9 for package: nspluginwrapper ---> Package yelp.x86_64 0:2.16.0-20.el5_2 set to be updated ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:3.0.1-1.el5.centos set to be updated ---> Package firefox.i386 0:3.0.1-1.el5.centos set to be updated --> Processing D...

...announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2012:1459 Low CentOS 6 nspluginwrapper Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2012:1457 CentOS 6 ORBit2 Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2012:1445 Low CentOS 5 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:16:20 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <jo...

...d didn't work right and the official 32-bit release crashed all the time), and it's been working relatively well until recently, particularly in the area of plugins. After updating to CentOS 5.2, I noticed that the flash plugin didn't work right. This might be due to a major change in nspluginwrapper - it is now included in the CentOS (RHEL) release, as opposed to being a download from rpmforge. Problem is - it doesn't seem to work right. My flash plugin does not work. At all. There was a new official release of Seamonkey (1.1.10) with an available contributed 64-bit build (haven'...

...importantly, how to get it OFF the main menu. Anyway, I reinstalled Seamonkey 1.1.1, and it landed flawlessly, although I had to look to find the x86_64 version. It came without any plugins, as usual, but I have tried reinstalling the flash player plugin, and it just won't work, not even with nspluginwrapper installed. Is there some trick to this that I need to know (and what?)? Thanks. -- Mark Hull-Richter, Linux Kernel Engineer DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com) 85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 949-680-3082 - Office 949-330-7691 - fax Ask me about CentOS Linux, and escape fr...

I'm having an issue with workstation opening pdf's with firefox. I have the adobe plugin installed and enabled in firefox but firefox will only let me save the file. Under applications I have tried using the doc reader and adobe to associate pdf's with firefox with no luck. I am running firefox 3.0.4. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you -- Bo Lynch

I am stuck taking this stupid online training course from work. It just sits there doing nothing with firefox, so I pulled up konqueror, and tell it to lie and say it's IE. That works... until it gets to the content, which some HR moron is *positive* desperately needs to be in flash. I've gone into konqi's configuration, and told it to scan the correct directory for plugins, and yet

I downoaded flash9 for linux. Installed it: ls /usr/lib64/mozilla-seamonkey-1.0.9/plugins/ flashplayer.xpt libflashplayer.so libnullplugin.so However seamonkey is not doing flash yet. Does it not work in 64 bit? Did I miss something? Anyone else have flash going on amd64? I thought you put the files in the above directory and restart. Didn't work for me. Jerry

I have the Adobe (Macromedia) flash player installed on my CentOS 4.4 x86_64 system, but when I try to play a flash movie in SeaMonkey (or Firefox - doesn't matter) I get no sound. I'm using the nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4 to make it work at all, but there's no sound. All my other sound devices/players work just fine, even my Windows guest on VMWare Server. Any ideas/suggestions? Yes, I'm planning to upgrade to CentOS 5 RSN - I'm waiting to get an exchange on my (defective) new SG 400GB driv...

Hello. I use Centos 4.4 x86_64 with firefox 1.5.0.10 64 bits with nspluginwrapper and runs reasonable well. I would like know if there is rpm packages for firefox 2.0.0.2 or 2.0.0.3 and if will run well under Centos x86_64 if someone has tried. Thanks Josep --------------------------------- LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?n...

I get interesting results on this one. If I run rpm -q -a | grep i386 as root, I get this: nspluginwrapper-i386-0.9.91.1-1 If I run as my local non-root user, I get this: libgcc-3.4.6-3.i386 libselinux-1.19.1-7.2.i386 libstdc++-3.4.6-3.i386 krb5-libs-1.3.4-33.i386 dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.7.i386 flash-plugin-9.0.31.0-release.i386 libart_lgpl-2.3.16-3.i386 compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3.i386...

...t Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode) Then ln -s /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0.26.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins about:plugins shows java enabled (oddly enough, I seem to have flash, 32-bit, in the 32 bit libs, and that doesn't show; guess I need to install nspluginwrapper). I go to the java tester, as recommended on the CentOS wiki, <http://javatester.org/version.html>, no pink rectangle, and if I click on the enabled link, firefox crashes, with firefox --no-remote -P Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/plugin2/main/serve...