search for: nsp32

.../net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c: function mwifiex_cfg80211_change_virtual_intf line 143 fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c: function o2net_process_message line 33 drivers/scsi/hpsa.c: function find_PCI_BAR_index line 27 drivers/s390/char/tape_34xx.c: function tape_34xx_unit_check line 351 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 193 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 204 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 215 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 220 drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c: function iowarrior_write line 44 drivers/usb/misc/iowarr...

.../net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c: function mwifiex_cfg80211_change_virtual_intf line 143 fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c: function o2net_process_message line 33 drivers/scsi/hpsa.c: function find_PCI_BAR_index line 27 drivers/s390/char/tape_34xx.c: function tape_34xx_unit_check line 351 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 193 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 204 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 215 drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: function nsp32_msgin_occur line 220 drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c: function iowarrior_write line 44 drivers/usb/misc/iowarr...

..._sli.c:10075: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c:10237: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return drivers/scsi/mvumi.c:2299: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return drivers/scsi/nsp32.c:2114: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return drivers/scsi/nsp32.c:2125: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mbx.c:4026: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return drivers/scsi/st.c...

From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see

From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see

...-DPARIT + subdir-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA) += pcmcia + + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI) += scsi_mod.o ++obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_TGT) += scsi_tgt.o + + obj-$(CONFIG_RAID_ATTRS) += raid_class.o + +@@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_FCAL) += fcal.o + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_LASI700) += 53c700.o lasi700.o + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_NSP32) += nsp32.o + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_IPR) += ipr.o ++obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_SRP) += libsrp.o + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_IBMVSCSI) += ibmvscsi/ + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI) += libata.o ahci.o + obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_SVW) += libata.o sata_svw.o +@@ -155,6 +157,8 @@ scsi_mod-y += scsi.o hosts.o scsi_ioct + scsi...