Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "nsfv4".
Did you mean:
nfsv4
2007 Mar 15
1
Samba 3.0.x, GPFS and NFSv4, ACLs and so on... ???
...t for Additional ACL Modules
==================================
Samba's POSIX ACL support has been moved inside of the VFS layer
which means it is now possible to support multiple ACL implementations
on the same server including NFSv3 and GPFS ACLs."
would you advise against the usage of NSFv4 and samba running on the
same GPFS cluster node? since we?re running older versions of samba
(original SLES10/ RHEL4 packages) the code could be not "developed"
enough in this manner...
besides this, are there any white papers, tuning options or
recommendations running samba on top of GP...
2015 Nov 04
1
Pam_mount not working with "sec=krb5"
...#39;t have the
>>> correctly inherited Windows ACLs (ergo problems with these shares when
>>> accessing them from Windows AD clients)
>>>
>> Strange, this works for me correct in the home folder.
>>
>> Test1 : login on a server with a NFS mounted homedir nsfV4 kerberos
>> mounted.
>> If i create a folder from a ssh shell access, with a kerberos
>> authenticated user. ( for me a user who does not type its password on
>> ssh access )
> Are you sure you are accessing the nfs mounted share on the server and
> not the share i...
2015 Nov 04
4
Pam_mount not working with "sec=krb5"
...nfs-mounted home share, these subcontainers won't have the
> correctly inherited Windows ACLs (ergo problems with these shares when
> accessing them from Windows AD clients)
>
Strange, this works for me correct in the home folder.
Test1 : login on a server with a NFS mounted homedir nsfV4 kerberos mounted.
If i create a folder from a ssh shell access, with a kerberos authenticated user. ( for me a user who does not type its password on ssh access )
And im also use-ing the setting :
acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes
on the home folder share.
Getfacl test shows me :
mkdir test...
2015 Nov 04
0
Pam_mount not working with "sec=krb5"
...these subcontainers won't have the
>> correctly inherited Windows ACLs (ergo problems with these shares when
>> accessing them from Windows AD clients)
>>
> Strange, this works for me correct in the home folder.
>
> Test1 : login on a server with a NFS mounted homedir nsfV4 kerberos mounted.
> If i create a folder from a ssh shell access, with a kerberos authenticated user. ( for me a user who does not type its password on ssh access )
Are you sure you are accessing the nfs mounted share on the server and
not the share itself? If you are setting the acl from windo...
2015 Nov 04
0
Pam_mount not working with "sec=krb5"
...have the
> >> correctly inherited Windows ACLs (ergo problems with these shares when
> >> accessing them from Windows AD clients)
> >>
> > Strange, this works for me correct in the home folder.
> >
> > Test1 : login on a server with a NFS mounted homedir nsfV4 kerberos
> mounted.
> > If i create a folder from a ssh shell access, with a kerberos
> authenticated user. ( for me a user who does not type its password on ssh
> access )
> Are you sure you are accessing the nfs mounted share on the server and
> not the share itself? If you a...
2015 Nov 04
3
Pam_mount not working with "sec=krb5"
Mathias, thanks again! This sounds like a very reasonable approach. I
know that with remote ssh and public key authentication you can set the
limit to a single possible command. is this also possible with AD users?
Unfortunately, I don't have 'multiuser' support in my current cifs-utils
version 4.8. So I would end up with your designated user being the owner
of all the files and