search for: ns5

...when we reboot - GRUB only shows the old 2.4.7-10 although there are 3 kernels listed in grub.conf My Question is "How can we select booting to 2.4.18-24.7 when GRUB lonly lists the oldest kernel?" Here are the contents of the directory /boot & also of grub.conf <SNIP> [root@ns5 boot]# ls -al total 10908 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Feb 6 09:27 . drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Feb 6 09:56 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5824 Jun 25 2001 boot.b -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 612 Jun 25 2001 chain.b -rw-r--r-- 1 root root...

Hi all, I see centos 3.5Beta in the beta.centos.org. Is this the next release of version 3 ? Strangely, 3.4 is not the final release of version 3 ? Thx Ceg Ryan

Hello Folks, We have 2 (identical hardware) busy public 2U rack servers, both have several hundred users & peak email (for example) deliveries at 300/5min during the daytime. Both servers run RAID1 over 2 EIDE disk drives. One server is fine - it never has problems - it is running RH7.3 and CPU loads are normal. The other server has constant disk activity & kjournald at CPU load of

...e. Of course that didn't work either. > > Emmett > You should check the permissions on the slaves folder to make sure named can write to it, also you should check if you have SElinux enabled, and if so check that the slaves folder is labelled as named_cache_t For example: [root at ns5 ~]# ll -Zd /var/named/slaves drwxrwx---. named named system_u:object_r:named_cache_t:s0 /var/named/slaves [root at ns5 ~]# ll -d /var/named/slaves drwxrwx---. 2 named named 4096 Jan 14 10:47 /var/named/slaves Tris ************************************************************* This email and any...

...ve now? /etc/shorewall providers loc 1 256 main eth1 10.194.79.254 track,balance eth1 atg 2 512 main eth0 66.224.62.97 track,balance eth1 /etc/shorewall/masq eth0 10.194.79.181 66.224.62.120 eth1 66.224.62.120 10.194.79.181 eth0 eth1 66.224.62.120 eth1 eth1 10.194.79.181 ns5:~ # shorewall show routing Can''t determine the IP address of eth2 Shorewall 4.0.2 Routing at ns5 - Fri Aug 31 12:32:42 PDT 2007 Routing Rules 0: from all lookup local 10256: from all fwmark 0x100 lookup loc 10512: from all fwmark 0x200 lookup atg 32766: from all lookup main 3...

Have you found a solution? Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:02 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:

...khints: unable to find root NS 'ns2.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns3.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns4.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns5.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns6.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns7.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns8.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Tim...

Basic question, but where is the readme or documentation on how to apply the samba patches? - I've always installed the complete versions.... But now I need to stay at 2.0.10, and need to apply the 2.0.10a patch. Could someone point me at a help file or give the command I need to run? Thanks.

...the only option displayed by GRUB is >2.4.7-10 >This is confirmed when the server boots and the kernel is displayed as >2.4.7-10 ></SNIP> > >Any ideas why GRUB does not show all 3 kernels & then boot the latest? > >Here is /boot/grub.conf ><snip> >[root@ns5 grub]# cat grub.conf ># grub.conf generated by anaconda ># ># Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file ># NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that ># all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. ># root...

...______________________ From: Stephen C. Tweedie [mailto:sct@redhat.com] Sent: 05 February 2003 10:13 To: Nico Morrison Cc: 'Andrew Morton'; ext3 users list Subject: RE: On very different journalling activity on 2 servers. Hi, On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 08:45, Nico Morrison wrote: > [root@ns5 nico]# /sbin/hdparm /dev/hda > /dev/hda: > using_dma = 0 (off) > Does this mean that dma is in fact off? Yes. > Looks like is ON on the server that has no problems and OFF on the one with > loadsa journalling? Yes. > What do we need to do & is it safe to turn DMA ON...

I am having a mail server problem where the mail to one domain is being sent to the wrong server. When I use "dig masonc.com mx", I get ;; ANSWER SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN MX 5 mail.masonc.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.picadoo.com. masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns2.picadoo.com. ;;

We run several RH7.2/7.3 servers & recently 2 of them, although still working fine, have started to show kjournald as generally using over 50% cpu% on 'top' - virtually continuously. Free cpu% generally less than 25% now! Both machines are also using software RAID5 EIDE ....... otherwise are standard server installs. Any info on what kjournald is & why it should have recently

...boot() called on cpu#1 syncing disks... Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 31 10:24:30 EDT 2003 mdtancsa@ns5.recycle.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/recycle Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(TM) MP 2000+ (1666.73-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x662 Stepping = 2 Features=0x383fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV...

Hello. I'm moving from a very old Fedora Core 1 to CentOS 4.4, what a change!! Three year ago, I wrote some script (network related) and worked very well. Now, I can put into init.d by means of chkconfig and I restarted the system, but always hang when executing my srcipt (in my new centos 4.4). There a manual for making scripts for init.d? there is some new requirement by which it does not