Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "nrn3475".
2013 Apr 18
0
OFFTOPIC: Ioannidis et. al. on non-reproducible research
...ly to me.****
Note: The Button commentary is a good quick summary if you don't want
to go through the NATURE paper.
Cheers,
Bert
Button, Ioannidis et al, ?Power failure: why small sample size
undermines the reliability of neuroscience?
http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nrn3475.html
A commentary by his co-author, Kate Button:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/sifting-the-evidence/2013/apr/10/unreliable-neuroscience-power-matters
The headline from this coverage is more blunt: ?Most brain science
papers are neurotrash?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/12/brain...