Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "nrh".
Did you mean:
nr
2004 Apr 01
0
Possible to add domain user accounts to a local linux group on samba-3 domain member server?
...way. Is Winbind limited to only using domain groups, or is the limitation
within the Linux OS itself to understand the domain user concept? Any
insight you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thank,
Jason McGlamary
PC/LAN Specialist
Division of Nursing - Nursing Informatics
Co-Chair WHC/NRH/IS Focus Forum
Washington Hospital Center
2023 Sep 25
1
[PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by
On 22.09.2023 19:32, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
>
> As found with
2023 Sep 25
1
[PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by
On 22.09.2023 19:32, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
>
> As found with
2023 Sep 25
1
[PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by
On 22.09.2023 19:32, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
>
> As found with
2020 Feb 27
2
[PATCH] Update the 5 year logo to 10 year logo
...J$6J*QG6<0&(XJtN$%3Rsl7OgdiecAfZ5Zv#V50z~H**2iP?
zZpf8jqZG@JJSvrENX1>u;PSK^270nwCitFyJZDoh{{|GD8mhGia`NGb{k~rT`4Eh<
zva&3?_Mi;HCGtw7x^zvw3I^q?blHTwLT!-T?ztfZ#MpQ=CqHdHP^KQ5fX+~M(@4<0
ziftZ|Z56RqupYdw#Rhq3s}*&#BL2$to%uanUSVN-3+$-aQ;m-|+$~7Yti~*G@|*%=
z+DOYAGZ0!!o&@4L5?AbL)NRh^wctkx<m^am&@S}W-r0ou>1r!lR~?j_GIqhk+bQ$Q
z6vpwAF~H<$*SgvB1H;&*e-IbCnCY?X>E_bJYe&dsi6FwQy0EPnp(_%)UD?vtlTw{z
zL?_hAhnP7-pKR#Mb>ioGbmF&&pFtJSMFEBf68E`Vli*@7nYd>PbkcY{;2-E>8xZWs
z5<hhCH=E8MlG4()k9x;#)MBROfOFU1E&gRSK0}B#TlC$~Lysh|DRqK6FVt>+_dMTS
zvVQ&g...
1997 Jul 28
0
WIN95 OSR2.1 problem solved
Recently Microsoft introduced some network improvements which made it
impossible to connect to Samba without using encrypted passwords.
There is a way-around for NT4.0 (SP3) by changing a registry entry. This
has been published by Microsoft in their knowledge-base.
With WIN95 OSR2.1 and the vredir patch (vredir.vxd and vnetsup.vxd dated
June, 2nd 1997 or later) the behaviour is very similar to