Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "nr_hypercalls".
Did you mean:
do_hypercalls
2005 Sep 05
2
[PATCH][1/6] add a hypercall number for virtual device in unmodified guest
...49 2005
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S Fri Sep 2 22:46:13 2005
@@ -812,6 +812,7 @@
.long do_ni_hypercall /* 25 */
.long do_mmuext_op
.long do_acm_op /* 27 */
+ .long do_virtual_device_op /* virutal device op for VMX */
.rept NR_hypercalls-((.-hypercall_table)/4)
.long do_ni_hypercall
.endr
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2007 Mar 27
0
[PATCH] make all performance counter per-cpu
...========================================================
--- 2007-03-19.orig/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S 2007-02-28 12:10:37.000000000 +0100
+++ 2007-03-19/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S 2007-03-27 12:12:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ ENTRY(hypercall)
GET_CURRENT(%ebx)
cmpl $NR_hypercalls,%eax
jae bad_hypercall
- PERFC_INCR(PERFC_hypercalls, %eax)
+ PERFC_INCR(PERFC_hypercalls, %eax, %ebx)
#ifndef NDEBUG
/* Create shadow parameters and corrupt those not used by this call. */
pushl %eax
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ handle_exception:
movl %...
2013 Aug 26
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] GLOBAL() macro for asm code.
Hello,
This series has been split into two patches, one for arm and one for x86. I
figured that this was easier than doing it as a single combined patch,
especially as the changes are functionally independent.
x86 has been boot tested, but arm has not even been compile tested as I lack a
suitable cross compiler. However, the changes are just text replacement, so I
dont expect any issues.
The
2013 Sep 23
57
[PATCH RFC v13 00/20] Introduce PVH domU support
This patch series is a reworking of a series developed by Mukesh
Rathor at Oracle. The entirety of the design and development was done
by him; I have only reworked, reorganized, and simplified things in a
way that I think makes more sense. The vast majority of the credit
for this effort therefore goes to him. This version is labelled v13
because it is based on his most recent series, v11.
2012 Aug 10
18
[PATCH v2 0/5] ARM hypercall ABI: 64 bit ready
Hi all,
this patch series makes the necessary changes to make sure that the
current ARM hypercall ABI can be used as-is on 64 bit ARM platforms:
- it defines xen_ulong_t as uint64_t on ARM;
- it introduces a new macro to handle guest pointers, called
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM (that has size 4 bytes on aarch and is going to
have size 8 bytes on aarch64);
- it replaces all the occurrences of
2012 Aug 16
27
[PATCH v3 0/6] ARM hypercall ABI: 64 bit ready
Hi all,
this patch series makes the necessary changes to make sure that the
current ARM hypercall ABI can be used as-is on 64 bit ARM platforms:
- it defines xen_ulong_t as uint64_t on ARM;
- it introduces a new macro to handle guest pointers, called
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM (that has size 4 bytes on aarch and is going to
have size 8 bytes on aarch64);
- it replaces all the occurrences of