Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nq_deb".
Did you mean:
dq_dqb
2006 Apr 20
0
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
...?b?Ie?????'???C?'Bx??
??~??6?OM???_|???????P???5?/?u?c????C???S?:??
?a??*??????:?i???rl????n??
9????5<?????
V*?p????????FC?????uP?ndV+f?f2
2X?G^???wlP?B???
????eUr???(B?D??k"???tY??o??I?= ????S
??
?^?????$???????8)?????????0EYy
#?v?$?
?#CY?p???{9
?2M???1?????n????
????R<zU:?V?h ?NQ_DeB?v?????;? ???.?%e????D?s?i?8??sf2?X?
?g?2K?V
???A?,?w??G?!,???
{QQW?D??0uNc??l'?????z%?c?2??yM?<?rr%"?? ???^????\?c:??Ig?
????V??u.?x?L{??`8??
?????)v?[?????5?l;??????U?j????_?U??OI]RfJ??????%)???0?#[?l;?????8?a;!N?{?~Q?6???j<?>d"??Us?
?\??_?#?|6'???WU-^
?(??????????S>?...
2006 Apr 19
2
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be
> doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As
> it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May
> (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken.
Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all
occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)