search for: npx

...Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c 1.80.2.4 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.18 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.21 src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c 1.80.2.3.14.1 RELENG_4_10...

...Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c 1.80.2.4 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.18 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.21 src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c 1.80.2.3.14.1 RELENG_4_10...

hume npx <humeafo at gmail.com> writes: > *hi,Óscar:* > * > * > *so following patch should address both the relocation problem and > uninstall tree problem, not fully tested just for discussion.* > * > * > Index: LLVMConfig.cmake.in > =======================================...

hume npx <humeafo at gmail.com> writes: Sorry for commenting the bug report here, but I can't loging to bugzilla right now. > Using cmake should be the right thing if you'd like to support windows, but > it seems that no enough effort on this build system, eg > http://llvm.org/bugs/...

Using cmake should be the right thing if you'd like to support windows, but it seems that no enough effort on this build system, eg http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12157 three months passed, I'am I bit familiar with cmake, so if there tasks pending for absence of developer, I'd like to join. cmake is not perfect but it's open, but many improvements maybe merged upstream.

*hi,Óscar:* * * *so following patch should address both the relocation problem and uninstall tree problem, not fully tested just for discussion.* * * Index: LLVMConfig.cmake.in =================================================================== --- LLVMConfig.cmake.in (revision 159425) +++ LLVMConfig.cmake.in (working copy) @@ -32,8 +32,11 @@ set(LLVM_ON_WIN32 @LLVM_ON_WIN32@)

hi, Óscar: bugzilla updated, please review. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120630/57716e17/attachment.html>

> > *hi,Óscar:* > * * > >Why? Please describe a case. > > >I need to do some futher experiment and to see whether I have been > wrong. > Since I touch this problem several months ago, so I did some test using the 3.2svn, the reason why uninstalled build 'cmake not work lies in set(LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX @LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX@) set(LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS

Hi, Óscar: nice to hear some voice on this. about LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR, yes, it made the installed version work only, if you'd like the uninstalled version to work, it should be detected as you suggested. about LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX the purpose is to make it really relocatable, eg, when installed under /lib/llvm I just later need to move the installation tree to /lusr/local/lib/llvm

On 28 Jun 2012, at 08:58, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > It's a chicken and egg problems. Xcode users don't use cmake because it > generates poor Xcode projects. So what *do* XCode users do (to build llvm/clang)? Do they somehow set up XCode to build using the autoconf build system? Do they build llvm/clang outside of XCode? If the answer to either of the last two questions is

hume npx <humeafo at gmail.com> writes: > Hi, Óscar: > nice to hear some voice on this. about LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR, yes, it > made the installed version work only, if you'd like the uninstalled version > to work, it should be detected as you suggested. > > about LLVM_INSTAL...

...500800<SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,<b25>,LM,3DNow+,3DNow> real memory = 2147155968 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2096119808 (1999 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 <Version 0.3> irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 npx0: [FAST] npx0: <math processor> on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: <A M I OEMXSDT> on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: &l...

...PUs cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec00000 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 netsmb_dev: loaded Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: <math processor> on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 12 entries at 0xc00fdf00 pcib0: <Host to PCI bridge> at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0 IOAPIC #1 intpin 13 -> irq 2 IOAPIC #1 intpin 12 -> irq 16 IOAPIC #1...

...mutex is adaptive. device isa device pci device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support device sc device agp # support several AGP chipsets device npx device pmtimer device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device miibus # MII bus support device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards device loop # Network loopback device mem # Memory and...

...AeDzw>H?XZyuyKliY&Py`9 z#z2B#Kh at t)rBt-PR;ATIIy6!rH at b$FBNw>6$SNm4^TJDz-5jE;3Hc*|?B2Y#NTpp( z<l7z$)oL&_?zINPm^YUj1>z8M%3NXCN1th@!(x>djLEm1?<L45!)l2ap?VQw1Nl;w zc0S#k&VcSyS!dAgNy+qK{N}X7GNM{rV4AAY^@jfhm%{4}`$YVH`+lWms<VpkQbO2r zQN!)%<~lWjbhOEj4m41Et)zw6RYrw1M0FNpX`xPa*N`_jBka0Xv72bM&Kn|Yy%Dq# zBk20rP-=j6Ui1!c1Z_fe>)6$_CgH`N^Aaz>_$rE3P~vaB!F$n5ybjTAVy#FM5e;H% z7;%lu8oyJ>gM at Wkv`n{_sp52FwXRVBG|wgV0($G#QZImX6b(|3lcXNPtsxu~645uH zGQMe)4B<+A2q)c8>>W)yTStYiXz!v-I$B|wAaaXGq|d)3l99NNCL{6HUSg=5L%2kV zGLZUev^CEzbh%b<XWc5bDj8d;R;6MqsPg)0KLX~y...

*hi,Óscar:* * * >LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX is supposed to contain the value of > >CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX when you configured LLVM. Using it for setting > >other variables is just a convenience. > > Ok, I understood your point, so I'd like to develop another patch to make > it relocatable and respect the original meanings. > > >CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_FILE can be