search for: nozo

> > Message: 6 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:44:42 +0200 From: Michal Soltys > <nozo@ziu.info> Subject: Re: [LARTC] I''m having an issue with u32 > masking To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Message-ID: > <46EF8FFA.6070707@ziu.info> Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Vadtec wrote: >> > Is this how tc is supposed to work? Does...

Hi all, I am wondering if anyone can help me to resolve a problem. I am trying to use tc command in linux to drop udp packets of specific diffserv value. I am able set diffserv value successfully in the udp packet using command:- [root@scotch src]#iptables --table mangle --append OUTPUT \ --out-interface eth0 --protocol udp --source-port 5060 \ --jump DSCP --set-dscp 8 but i am not able to

Hello I have few questions regarding tc functionality (qdiscs, classes, etc.) when vlans are in use. For example, consider interface eth0, for which I create and extra vlan with vconfig, let''s say eth0.11. Then using tc I can add usual things - qdiscs, filters, ... - to both eth0 and eth0.11. The questions are: - on which interface - virtual or real, should I actually use tc ? Or

As in subject, if you for instance create a simple passwd-file with: test at domain.tld:{plain}pass:20000:10::/home/regular/.test::userdb_mail=maildir:%h/maildir Dovecot (rc23 & 27) will expand %h to empty string, and try to make a directory under / Mar 14 14:25:28 rasengan dovecot: IMAP(test at domain.tld): mkdir(/maildir/cur) failed: Permission denied Mar 14 14:25:28 rasengan dovecot:

With following configuration: userdb static { args = uid=10000 gid=10000 home=/home/vmail/domain.tld/%u/./ mail=maildir:~/maildirs } and accompanying passdb passwd-file consisting of only user and password, for example test:{PLAIN}test: dovecot will access home=/home/vmail/domain.tld/test/home/vmail/domain.tld/test/maildirs instead of home=/home/vmail/domain.tld/test/maildirs dovecot

After checking f_u32.c sources, there''s one extra parameter parsed - indev, that is nowhere described - not even in commandline help or in excellent Russell''s documentation. Does anyone know, what''s the purpose of it ?

Hello TC''s syntax, particulary u32 filter, is far more rich than what man, howto or command''s help provides. I''ve been looking for information about the uses of ''offset'' parameter, or more detailed explanation of a few other/relevan options, but what I''ve found is very brief to say the least. So I checked the sources of cls_u32.c and

Today I''ve noticed a bit strange (?) behaviour when prio qdisc is used. Example (having no filters/qdisc/etc. at the start) : Add simple 9 bands qdisc, set each mapping to lowest priority band: tc qdisc add dev $eth root handle 1: prio bands 9 priomap 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 If I do just that, all is fine - whole traffic ends in 9th band, what can easily be verified by tc -s

Recently I've made the post about "double homedir" problem, but I couldn't recreate it later. Here're the exact steps to make it happen (configuration is at the bottom): 1) set configuration as below with passwd-files 2) clean testms dir (not necessary though) 3) reload dovecot (HUP is enough) 4) access the server with any client using testms user (make sure no other

I'm not sure if it's even intended to work in this particular case, but there's a problem when chroot is explicitely defined and rawlogging is used. Rawlog respects chroot point, without being actually chrooted. Consider configurtion as below, with two cases (dovecot.rawlog dir is of course created earlier, with appropriate uid/gid). 1) dovecot.userdb:

Originally I've thought that this is related to INBOX field, but it turned out it happens only when you specify mbox. Consider following passwd-file: testms::10000:10000:imap,,,:/home/vmail/ppgk.com.pl/testms/./::userdb_mail=mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/home/vmail/ppgk.com.pl/%u/inbox or following line from userdb static: args = uid=10000 gid=10000 home=/home/vmail/ppgk.com.pl/%u/./

Today I've been trying to get dovecot (1.0 rc2) to use certificates for client side authentication. If my memory serves right, beta8 had no problems with it (although it was some time ago and on different machine). Similar setup works perfectly well for postfix (for authentication that is, on the same machine). Originally I thought I overdid some certificate settings (keyUsage, nsCertType,

While experimenting a bit, I found that for some reason, locking indexes with flock is problematic, but only if user is taken from passwd-file. The host system is openbsd 3.9, dovecot's configuration is added at the bottom. Authentication is from two places - first from mentioned passwd-file, then from passwd file using bsdauth (in this case, there're no problems with flock). So, if