search for: noverifi

I can use llc to compile my IR module to amdgcn with some non-zero output. However, if try to write the output (assembly or object) to a string (via buffer_ostream) the resulting string has always zero length. Here the code changes I do: Original llc:       if (Target->addPassesToEmitFile(PM, *OS,                                       DwoOut ? &DwoOut->os() : nullptr,

Fix a bug which would have prevented an SSL certification from ever being verified. --- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm | 15 ++++++++------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm b/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm index 1da382a..66ba515 100644 --- a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm +++ b/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@

Hi, I'm embarrassed that I can't figure this out... I have a compiler that outputs my module in either .s assembly format or .obj binary format, either one works just fine. But if I try to output both of them by adding passes, LLVM throws an Assert: void WinCOFFStreamer::EmitLabel(MCSymbol *Symbol) { assert(Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol

mkinitrd needs to mount files using loop. loop might be a module, so try to load it first. --- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/GuestOS/RedHat.pm | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/GuestOS/RedHat.pm b/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/GuestOS/RedHat.pm index 0e469f5..08027b6 100644 --- a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/GuestOS/RedHat.pm +++ b/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/GuestOS/RedHat.pm @@ -1114,6

> > On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Jiri Danek via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I found https://github.com/google/java-thread-sanitizer, which seems to > be now abandoned. It used to work with ThreadSanitizer v1. Has anybody ever > tried to make it work with the current ThreadSanitizer? > > I gave it a try and bending java-thread-sanitizer to my

This patch refactors the data transfer code with several goals: * Have a common read(source)/write(target) loop so that common processing can happen in the middle of it, e.g. format change/progress bar * Provide volume metadata to transfers to allow smarter reading/writing, e.g. of sparse files * Simplify the data transfer code The patch *isn't* NFC because there are some minor behaviour

Hello, So the current JIT will be superseded by the MCJIT completely and no further development should be expected for the current JIT? In any case, I am definitely interested in submitting a patch if you could help me by sending me in the right direction, since I really want this working. I managed to reproduce this behavior in LLVM 3.0 by modifying llc to read my .bc file and try to JIT the

Hello, I've been looking at ThreadSanitizer in https://github.com/llvm-mirror/compiler-rt and I noticed some Java-related files. Is there a version of ThreadSanitizer build on top of that, which I could use to sanitize my Java programs? I could not find any. I found https://github.com/google/java-thread-sanitizer, which seems to be now abandoned. It used to work with ThreadSanitizer v1. Has

Hi all, I was trying to implement an obfuscation tool for C-code on the basis of LLVM. I got a prototype of the simple obfuscation transformation which converting control flow graph to something like a state machine. I am not sure I will have time to work on extending further this tool with new transformations like opaque predicates and decided to put here source code I have by now with hope

Guillermo, > I'm sorry I forgot to mention I am compiling the bitcode using the JIT. The > actual error, I get when I'm trying to get the function to the pointer. I'm > using a custom front end that translates Android's Dalvik bytecode into LLVM > bitcode based on Android ICS's modified LLVM version. ARM JIT is broken in many ways. So, what you're seeing is

The interface files you see are for a prototype of Java Tsan that's internal to Google. It's for use by a JDK that we customized with extensive JVM patches, and enables running the Tsan engine on Java and native code simultaneously. We presented this prototype recently at the JVM Language Summit. Here's the talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UykhZ36W04I We are starting to explore

Hi, I'm sorry I forgot to mention I am compiling the bitcode using the JIT. The actual error, I get when I'm trying to get the function to the pointer. I'm using a custom front end that translates Android's Dalvik bytecode into LLVM bitcode based on Android ICS's modified LLVM version. Thanks, On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:55 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>

Here is the bulk of the sanitizing. My residual doubts center around the question whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code in 2.0/2.1. I need a definitive word on this to proceed. My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached

The following patches are where I'm currently at with ESX support. I can now import a domain from ESX along with its storage. Note that I'm not yet doing any conversion. In fact, I've never even tested past the import stage (I just had an exit in there). The meat is really in the 4th patch. The rename of MetadataReader->Connection was because the Connection is now really providing

With this patchset I have successfully[1] imported a RHEL 5 guest directly from ESX with the following command line: virt-v2v -ic 'esx://yellow.marston/?no_verify=1' -op transfer RHEL5-64 Login details are stored in ~/.netrc Note that this is the only guest I've tested against. I haven't for example, checked that I haven't broken Xen imports. Matt [1] With the exception of

Move all target-specific functionality into its own module in preparation for output to RHEV. --- MANIFEST | 1 + lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Connection.pm | 46 ++--- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Converter.pm | 138 +------------ lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Target/LibVirt.pm | 419 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm | 91 +++------ po/POTFILES.in