Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nov26".
Did you mean:
nov2
2012 Nov 26
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] RFC: Merge branches/R600 into TOT for 3.2 release
...audit the macros and change them to UPPERCASE so it's obvious that there's some macro magic at work.
>
I've made these changes and also renamed the directory from AMDGPU
to R600 as suggested by Chris. An updated patch can be found here:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~tstellar/llvm/Nov26/
I've also included in that directory the 6 patches I wrote to implement
these changes, to make it easier to see what is different. If you see
anything I left out, let me know.
> Overall I think this should go in as soon as possible. It has been around for a while and you have been active...
2012 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] RFC: Merge branches/R600 into TOT for 3.2 release
...nge them to UPPERCASE so it's obvious that there's some macro magic at work.
>>
>
> I've made these changes and also renamed the directory from AMDGPU
> to R600 as suggested by Chris. An updated patch can be found here:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~tstellar/llvm/Nov26/
Sorry for being pedantic, but there are still misplaced braces in your patch. You can easily find them in the source code with:
$ grep -r '^[ ]*{$'
Otherwise I don't see anything else that needs fixing offhand.
> I've also included in that directory the 6 patches I wrote to...
2012 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] RFC: Merge branches/R600 into TOT for 3.2 release
On 01.11.2012, at 14:44, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> Moving this thread to llvmdev.
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:09:34PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> Time is running short, but this would be great. The best place to
2012 Nov 01
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] RFC: Merge branches/R600 into TOT for 3.2 release
Moving this thread to llvmdev.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:09:34PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> Time is running short, but this would be great. The best place to start is to begin decomposing the mega-patch into individual pieces that makes sense. Do you have