search for: nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head

...eau_display_scanoutpos, }; static void diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index 53f9bceaf17a..86f99dc8fcef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -136,21 +136,13 @@ nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int *vpos, int *hpos, } bool -nouveau_display_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe, +nouveau_display_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool in_vblank_irq, int *vpos, int *hpos, ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime, const struct drm_display_m...

...eau_display_scanoutpos, }; static void diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index 53f9bceaf17a..86f99dc8fcef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -136,21 +136,13 @@ nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int *vpos, int *hpos, } bool -nouveau_display_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe, +nouveau_display_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool in_vblank_irq, int *vpos, int *hpos, ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime, const struct drm_display_m...

We get 1 warning about global functions without a declaration in the nouveau nouveau_display driver when building with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:96:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. so this patch marks it 'static'. Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_di...

...changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index 8d1df5678eaa..f8f555e2e912 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -113,10 +113,11 @@ nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int *vpos, int *hpos, struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &crtc->dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(crtc)]; int retry = 20; bool ret = false; + int method_ret; do { - ret = nvif_mthd(&disp->disp, 0, &args, sizeof(args)); - if (ret != 0) + int method_ret...

...| 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index 6104f61..21b10f9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int *vpos, int *hpos, }; struct nouveau_display *disp = nouveau_display(crtc->dev); struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &crtc->dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(crtc)]; - int ret, retry = 1; + int ret, retry = 20; do { ret = nvif_mthd(&disp->disp, 0, &a...

We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, these functions are declared in

...uveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index afbf557..b60ee21 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ calc(int blanks, int blanke, int total, int line) return line; } -int +static int nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int *vpos, int *hpos, ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c index 4e3de34..619f79d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c @@ -66,7...

We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous

...uveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index afbf557..b60ee21 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ calc(int blanks, int blanke, int total, int line) return line; } -int +static int nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int *vpos, int *hpos, ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c index 4e3de34..619f79d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv10_fence.c @@ -66,7...

VBLANK handlers in struct drm_driver are deprecated. Only legacy, non-KMS drivers are supposed to used them. DRM drivers with kernel modesetting are supposed to use VBLANK callbacks of the CRTC infrastructure. This patchset converts all DRM drivers to CRTC VBLANK callbacks and cleans up struct drm_driver. The remaining VBLANK callbacks in struct drm_driver are only used by legacy drivers. Patch

VBLANK handlers in struct drm_driver are deprecated. Only legacy, non-KMS drivers are supposed to used them. DRM drivers with kernel modesetting are supposed to use VBLANK callbacks of the CRTC infrastructure. This patchset converts all DRM drivers to CRTC VBLANK callbacks and cleans up struct drm_driver. The remaining VBLANK callbacks in struct drm_driver are only used by legacy drivers. Patch

VBLANK handlers in struct drm_driver are deprecated. Only legacy, non-KMS drivers are supposed to used them. DRM drivers with kernel modesetting are supposed to use VBLANK callbacks of the CRTC infrastructure. This patchset converts all DRM drivers to CRTC VBLANK callbacks and cleans up struct drm_driver. The remaining VBLANK callbacks in struct drm_driver are only used by legacy drivers.

VBLANK handlers in struct drm_driver are deprecated. Only legacy, non-KMS drivers are supposed to used them. DRM drivers with kernel modesetting are supposed to use VBLANK callbacks of the CRTC infrastructure. This patchset converts all DRM drivers to CRTC VBLANK callbacks and cleans up struct drm_driver. The remaining VBLANK callbacks in struct drm_driver are only used by legacy drivers.

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,