search for: nouveau_device_platform_create

.../device/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/device/base.c index a6abb51..ba6c2f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/device/base.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/device/base.c @@ -543,3 +543,37 @@ done: mutex_unlock(&nv_devices_mutex); return ret; } + +int +nouveau_device_platform_create_(struct platform_device *pdev, u64 name, + const char *sname, const char *cfg, + const char *dbg, int length, void **pobject) +{ + struct nouveau_device *device; + int ret = -EEXIST; + + mutex_lock(&nv_devices_mutex); + list_for_each_entry(device, &nv_devices, head) { + if (device-&g...

...hat away and it's not like this is called from a hot path. I do see that pci_resource_len() does additional checking for BARs that have zero size (start == 0 && end == start), so it's not exactly the same, but I think there's another issue with that, see below. > +int > +nouveau_device_platform_create_(struct platform_device *pdev, u64 name, > + const char *sname, const char *cfg, > + const char *dbg, int length, void **pobject) > +{ > + struct nouveau_device *device; > + int ret = -EEXIST; > + > + mutex_lock(&nv_devices_mutex); > + list_for_each_entry(device, &...

...rm_get_irq_byname(device->platformdev, + stall ? "stall" : "nonstall"); + } +} + static struct nouveau_oclass nouveau_device_oclass = { .handle = NV_ENGINE(DEVICE, 0x00), @@ -489,3 +555,37 @@ done: mutex_unlock(&nv_devices_mutex); return ret; } + +int +nouveau_device_platform_create_(struct platform_device *pdev, u64 name, + const char *sname, const char *cfg, + const char *dbg, int length, void **pobject) +{ + struct nouveau_device *device; + int ret = -EEXIST; + + mutex_lock(&nv_devices_mutex); + list_for_each_entry(device, &nv_devices, head) { + if (device-&g...

Hello everyone, GK20A is the Kepler-based GPU used in the upcoming Tegra K1 chips. The following patches perform architectural changes to Nouveau that are necessary to support non-PCI GPUs and add initial support for GK20A. Although the support is still very basic and more user-space changes will be needed to make the full graphics stack run on top of it, we were able to successfully open

...ly make the code crash later). > > I do see that pci_resource_len() does additional checking for BARs that > have zero size (start == 0 && end == start), so it's not exactly the > same, but I think there's another issue with that, see below. > >> +int >> +nouveau_device_platform_create_(struct platform_device *pdev, u64 name, >> + const char *sname, const char *cfg, >> + const char *dbg, int length, void **pobject) >> +{ >> + struct nouveau_device *device; >> + int ret = -EEXIST; >&gt...