search for: nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image

...1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c index e83db051e851..931b62097366 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) int i; for (i = 0; i < drm->vbios.length; i++) - seq_printf(m, "%c", drm->vbios.data[i]); + seq_putc(m, drm->vbios.data[i]); return 0; } -- 2.45.2

...), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > index e83db051e851..931b62097366 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < drm->vbios.length; i++) > - seq_printf(m, "%c", drm->vbios.data[i]); > + seq_putc(m, drm->vbios.data[i]); Is there some reason this whole thing isn't ju...

...t a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > >> index e83db051e851..931b62097366 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > >> int i; > >> > >> for (i = 0; i < drm->vbios.length; i++) > >> - seq_printf(m, "%c", drm->vbios.data[i]); > >> + seq_putc(m, drm->vbios.data[i]); >...

...; >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c >> index e83db051e851..931b62097366 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) >> int i; >> >> for (i = 0; i < drm->vbios.length; i++) >> - seq_printf(m, "%c", drm->vbios.data[i]); >> + seq_putc(m, drm->vbios.data[i]); > > Is there some reas...

This is a small patch series that adds a strap_peek file into our debugfs, and sets the size of the vbios.rom debugfs file so that nvbios can easily be used to parse the vbios even on systems where the normal BIOS retrieval methods (for example, laptops that need ACPI to access the vbios for the nvidia GPU) won't work. This should make it a little easier to collect vbioses. Lyude Paul (2):

...ugfs.c > +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ > * Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > */ > > +#include <nvkm/subdev/pmu.h> > + > #include "nouveau_debugfs.h" > #include "nouveau_drm.h" > > @@ -43,8 +45,29 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > return 0; > } > > +static int > +nouveau_debugfs_current_load(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > +{ > + struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; > + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node-&...

This hooks up the DRM helpers for dumping information on the current status of each MST topology from nouveau's perspective to debugfs files, similar to what i915 does (albeit, i915 labels their debugfs node for this as i915_dp_mst_info). Lyude Paul (2): drm/nouveau: Expose nv50 MST structures in disp.h drm/nouveau: Hook up dp_mst_info in debugfs drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c

...quot;nouveau_bo.h" +#include "nouveau_abi16.h" +#include "nv50_display.h" +#include "nouveau_fence.h" +#include "nouveau_chan.h" +#include "nouveau_gem.h" +#include "nouveau_fbcon.h" +#include "subdev/fb.h" static int nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) @@ -43,8 +51,204 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) return 0; } +static void nouveau_get_access(char *ba, u32 access) +{ + if (access & NV_MEM_ACCESS_RO) + *ba++ = 'R'; + else + *ba++ = '-'; + + if (access &am...

...92e07..ec3d3d3 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ * Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> */ +#include <nvkm/subdev/pmu.h> + #include "nouveau_debugfs.h" #include "nouveau_drm.h" @@ -43,8 +45,29 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) return 0; } +static int +nouveau_debugfs_current_load(struct seq_file *m, void *data) +{ + struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); + struct nvkm_pmu *pmu = nvxx_pmu(&am...

...92e07..ec3d3d3 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ * Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> */ +#include <nvkm/subdev/pmu.h> + #include "nouveau_debugfs.h" #include "nouveau_drm.h" @@ -43,8 +45,29 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) return 0; } +static int +nouveau_debugfs_current_load(struct seq_file *m, void *data) +{ + struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); + struct nvkm_pmu *pmu = nvxx_pmu(&am...

...92e07..ec3d3d3 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ * Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> */ +#include <nvkm/subdev/pmu.h> + #include "nouveau_debugfs.h" #include "nouveau_drm.h" @@ -43,8 +45,29 @@ nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) return 0; } +static int +nouveau_debugfs_current_load(struct seq_file *m, void *data) +{ + struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); + struct nvkm_pmu *pmu = nvxx_pmu(&am...

...et, inode->i_private); +} + +static const struct file_operations nouveau_boost_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = nouveau_debugfs_boost_open, + .read = seq_read, + .write = nouveau_debugfs_boost_set, +}; + static struct drm_info_list nouveau_debugfs_list[] = { { "vbios.rom", nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image, 0, NULL }, }; @@ -189,6 +264,7 @@ static const struct nouveau_debugfs_files { const char *name; const struct file_operations *fops; } nouveau_debugfs_files[] = { + {"boost", &nouveau_boost_fops}, {"pstate", &nouveau_pstate_fops}, }; -- 2.7.4

I made a little changes in this series: 1. merge the two last patches together 2. unify the private data interface with the drm debugfs one now it should be very obvious for a new dev on how to add new files to debugfs and how to get access to the nouveau structs Karol Herbst (5): debugfs: add infrastructure to add files with other fops than only read debugfs: rename functions to

...ivate; struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c index 2a36d1ca8fda..96b59d5d68ed 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) { - struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); int i; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/o...

...ivate; struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c index 2a36d1ca8fda..96b59d5d68ed 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) { - struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); int i; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/o...

...; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > index 2a36d1ca8fda..96b59d5d68ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > static int > nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > { > - struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; > + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; > struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); > int i; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/oma...

...; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > index 2a36d1ca8fda..96b59d5d68ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > static int > nouveau_debugfs_vbios_image(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > { > - struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; > + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; > struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(node->minor->dev); > int i; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/oma...

this series makes use of the load counters we can use to get information about the current load of the gpu. This series includes the needed pmu bits and a debugfs interface to read them out. Currently the values are between 0 and 255, because it is much easier to implement it this way on the pmu. Karol Herbst (4): subdev/pmu/fuc: add gk104 pmu/fuc: add macros for pdaemon pwr counters

these are usually used for dynamic reclocking on gt215 and newer The counters are used to get the load of the core, memory, video and pcie loads currently I expose the loads through a debugfs "current_load" file, but I want to move that to nvif and just add a wrapper around that in debugfs for convenience Anyway there are still some issues I would like to discuss: 1. currently the

these are usually used for dynamic reclocking on gt215 and newer The counters are used to get the load of the core, memory, video and pcie loads currently I expose the loads through a debugfs "current_load" file, but I want to move that to nvif and just add a wrapper around that in debugfs for convenience. Using nvif would have the advantage, that userspace tools can easily get loads