Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "nouinx".
Did you mean:
noting
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
...oaded_files on /home/myuser/shared type cifs
(rw,relatime,vers=3.0,cache=strict,username=vl,domain=,uid=1000,forceuid,gid=1000,forcegid,addr=95.216.67.179,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1)
Namely: forceuid, forcegid, nouinx, serverino, & mapposix
Could any of these be causing the problems that I'm observing?
PS: vers=3.0 didn't fix the problem!
-- Saurabh.
2019 Feb 14
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
...you what was picked. More info on how to use
wireshark here [1]. It's a bit old and only covers SMB1 but it's a good
ressource.
> Further, `mount` is showing a LOT of options that I did not specify. I do
> not fully understand their impact:
> [...]
> Namely: forceuid, forcegid, nouinx, serverino, & mapposix
Note that some of this option string is generated at runtime by the
kernel, so what you see is the current running state, which might differ
from what you provided as some options are deduced/tried during connection.
* forceuid/forcegid are sort of internal options to s...
2019 Feb 08
8
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
## QUESTION
I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps
connection).
1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds,
compared with **72 minutes** on the client. Is this difference in
performance expected (due to network and protocol overhead)?
2) While the client is executing an `ls -lR`, one smbd process on the
server uses about 30-40% of a