search for: notty

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50 matches for "notty".

Did you mean: natty
2013 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] InstMetrics would look a lot like NoTTI
I want to expose most of the logic in NoTTI to passes that do not depend on TTI for the purpose of pure IR-level instruction metrics. For example, we don't want the presence of certain "free" intrinsics to affect the patterns handled by canonical transforms. It would still be ok to use DataLayout here, so certain casts are considered free. The idea of "free" here has little
2013 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] InstMetrics would look a lot like NoTTI
FWIW, this all makes perfect sense from a philosophical point of view. If anything, I think it is absolutely critical to differentiate the very interface this exposes from the TTI interfaces. The latter should be cost functions, that are as accurate as we can make them while remaining largely "conservative" (IE, don't assume any clever brilliance is the chip or backend; what is the
2006 Jan 04
1
[Bug 1143] connections with "sshd: root@notty" is established but not closed
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 Summary: connections with "sshd: root at notty" is established but not closed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support Assigned...
2007 Aug 29
0
reverse mapping check; authentication methods
...29 02:23:31 otso sshd[21000]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for powered.by.e-leven.be [78.110.207.104] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Aug 29 02:23:31 otso sshd[21000]: Invalid user upload from 78.110.207.104 and these also show as multiple 'lastb' entries in btmp: upload ssh:notty 78.110.207.104 Wed Aug 29 02:23 - 02:23 (00:00) upload ssh:notty 78.110.207.104 Wed Aug 29 02:23 - 02:23 (00:00) upload ssh:notty 78.110.207.104 Wed Aug 29 02:23 - 02:23 (00:00) upload ssh:notty 78.110.207.104 Wed Aug 29 02:23 - 02:23 (00:00) upload ssh:notty 78.1...
2015 Jan 17
3
[LLVMdev] loop multiversioning
Does LLVM have loop multiversioning ? it seems it does not with clang++ -O3 -mllvm -debug-pass=Arguments program.c -c bash-4.1$ clang++ -O3 -mllvm -debug-pass=Arguments fast_algorithms.c -c clang-3.6: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated Pass Arguments: -datalayout -notti -basictti -x86tti -targetlibinfo -no-aa -tbaa -scoped-noalias
2006 Jul 06
0
[Bug 1143] connections with "sshd: root@notty" is established but not closed
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Comment #2 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-07-06 21:09
2006 Oct 07
0
[Bug 1143] connections with "sshd: root@notty" is established but not closed
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #3 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:44 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception
2015 Mar 01
4
scp -rp behavior(SOLVED)
On Sun, March 1, 2015 10:22 am, Richard wrote: > > > ------------ Original Message ------------ >> Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 10:44:08 -0500 >> From: Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> >> To: centos at centos.org, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at aol.com> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] scp -rp behavior(SOLVED) >> >> On 02/26/15 19:45, Valeri
2015 Mar 01
0
scp -rp behavior(SOLVED)
...ng, the daemon creates an unprivileged process for the user, and that process performs the operation. Were it to be otherwise you would have a gaping hole in security. $ ssh pi-1 ps -f UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD jmr 3054 3050 0 04:22 ? 00:00:00 sshd: jmr at notty jmr 3055 3054 0 04:22 ? 00:00:00 ps -f $ ssh pi-1 ps -ef | grep ssh root 2432 1 0 Feb28 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/sshd root 3056 2432 0 04:23 ? 00:00:00 sshd: jmr [priv] jmr 3060 3056 0 04:23 ? 00:00:00 sshd: jmr at notty The first command sh...
2015 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] LTO v. opt
Thanks to you both. On my Linux (centos6) system, I have reproduce a variant of the bug and learned about -plugin-opt=-debug-pass=Arguments which I infer from comments is intended to built arguments to “opt” however I found that some of the arguments don’t seem to be quite correct. I assume this just minor bit rot. bin/opt -o pass1.bc -datalayout -notti -basictti -x86tti -targetlibinfo
2004 Dec 29
29
[Bug 967] Command only sessions hangs on target system.
...ugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dimitrij at schlund.de on Debian Linux ( sarge ) with kernel 2.6.9 hangs a non privileged thread from sshd if esecuted command returns. Not every request hangs, but a lot: 4683 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd 6295 ? Ss 0:00 \_ sshd: root at notty 6297 ? Zs 0:00 | \_ [check_dpt] <defunct> 8000 ? Ss 0:00 \_ sshd: root at notty 8002 ? Zs 0:00 | \_ [check_dpt] <defunct> 8048 ? Ss 0:00 \_ sshd: root at notty 8050 ? Zs 0:00 | \_ [check_dpt] <defunct> 8063 ?...
2015 Dec 02
5
Is there a way to pass Optimization passes to clang?
0 down vote favorite <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34049511/how-to-pass-optimization-passes-to-clang#> I'm trying to debug an issue for a new target where a testcase fails with -O1 optimization and passes with -O0 optimization. I got a list of optimization passes being performed when 'clang -O1' is called like this: llvm-as < /dev/null | opt -O1 -disable-output
2007 Jul 12
0
2.6.22.1 on CentOS 4.5, No tty0?
...led 2.6.22.1 kernel on my CentOS 4.5 box, during boot up, rc.sysinit complains cannot find /dev/tty0 to get keymap (line 294), and I cannot login to the box via ssh, the passwd authentication do pass, but no console opened, ssh just hangs, and "ps ax" on the CentOS box shows "sshd at notty". There are only these ttys: crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 5, 0 2007-07-12 /dev/tty crw--w---- 1 root tty 4, 1 7? 12 14:49 /dev/tty1 crw------- 1 root root 4, 2 7? 12 14:48 /dev/tty2 crw------- 1 root root 4, 3 7? 12 14:48 /dev/tty3 crw------- 1 root root 4, 4 7? 12 14:48 /dev/tty4 crw--...
2003 Jul 13
1
sshd 'zombie' processes
each scp or ssh I do to a 4.8-stable machine I have gives me two 'zombie' processes: root 282 0.0 0.4 5236 2184 ?? I 7:41AM 0:00.05 sshd: imp [priv] (sshd) imp 284 0.0 0.4 5252 2260 ?? I 7:41AM 0:00.01 sshd: imp@notty (sshd) I had been running 4.8-RC when I first noticed it and reported it. People here said this had been fixed shortly after 4.8, but it is still broken. :-( Warner
2015 May 11
2
[LLVMdev] about MemoryDependenceAnalysis usage
add -basicaa to your command line :) On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Willy WOLFF <willy.mh.wolff at gmail.com> wrote: > I play a bit more with MemoryDependenceAnalysis by wrapping my pass, and > call explicitely BasicAliasAnalysis. Its still using No Alias Analysis. > > How can I let MemoryDependenceAnalysis use BasicAliasAnalysis? > > Please, find attached my pass. >
2004 Jan 19
3
OpenSSH - forced command - no-pty issue
.../tmp/test.sh that in turn calls "sleep 1000". If we run a forced command command="/tmp/test.sh",no-pty,no-port-forwarding ssh-rsa it gives the following processes: root 12724 1 0 04:46:13 ? 0:00 /opt/ssh/sbin/sshd root 13309 12724 10 05:24:20 ? 0:00 sshd: root at notty root 13313 13309 4 05:24:21 ? 0:00 /tmp/test.sh root 13314 13313 2 05:24:21 ? 0:00 sleep 1000 When we disconnect the client, the sshd process is killed and the shell script keeps running: root 12724 1 0 04:46:13 ? 0:00 /opt/ssh/sbin/sshd root 13313 1 0 05:24:21 ? 0...
2014 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] how to choose which alias analysis used in my pass?
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jingyue Wu" <jingyue at google.com> > To: "songlh" <songlh at cs.wisc.edu>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 2:50:12 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] how to choose which alias analysis used in my pass? > > > Isn't -basicaa the default alias analysis already? No, -basicaa is added
2015 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] LTO v. opt
On Jan 3, 2015, at 11:52 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 2, 2015, at 8:32 PM, David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am new to the LLVM dev community so forgive a perhaps obvious question. I am looking at bug 17623 which is an LTO/optimizer interaction bug. I am working on a Mac with Xcode installed but have
2015 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] about MemoryDependenceAnalysis usage
Hi, I try to use MemoryDependenceAnalysis in a pass to analyse a simple function: void fct (int *restrict*restrict M, int *restrict*restrict L) { S1: M[1][1] = 1; S2: L[2][2] = 2; } When I iterate over MemoryDependenceAnalysis on the S2 statement, I get the load instruction for the first depth of the array, that’s ok. But I get also the load and store for the S1 statement. I assume the
2007 Apr 26
2
FreeNX authenticates but no desktop on centos 5 ??
...rying to connect, During this time, on the remote (CentOS) machine, its clear that something is happening, because "ps -ef | grep nx" on the server machine gives me root 5627 3378 0 10:38 ? 00:00:00 sshd: nx [priv] nx 5629 5627 0 10:38 ? 00:00:00 sshd: nx at notty nx 5630 5629 0 10:38 ? 00:00:00 /bin/bash /usr/bin/nxserver -c /usr/bin/nxserver nx 5771 5630 0 10:38 ? 00:00:00 sleep 60 jg 5800 5393 0 10:38 pts/1 00:00:00 grep nx I checked out a couple other things on the web on how to set it up and these did not help (...