search for: notorious

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > I ask because many of these LTS distros are notoriously slow at updating > their packages. While some people may think C++14 doesn't provide enough > bang for the buck to justify bumping to GCC 4.9, C++17 definitely does. But > at that point we're going to be talking about GCC 6.1 or 6.2, which is > going to be significantly harder...

I'm not reporting a bug (I know it's not the right place to do that anyway), but a little help would be appreciated. Once again I run into the famous "compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing" error. The problem is I can't figure out what's wrong. I use fedora core 6 on an athlon XP with an ati RV250 and the radeon open-source drivers running compiz reports: $

...amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: >> >> I ask because many of these LTS distros are notoriously slow at updating >> their packages. While some people may think C++14 doesn't provide enough >> bang for the buck to justify bumping to GCC 4.9, C++17 definitely does. But >> at that point we're going to be talking about GCC 6.1 or 6.2, which is >> going to be sign...

I know ATI is notoriously bad at supporting Linux but I was wondering how well this card works under Ubuntu. Does it support 3D rendering?

Hi, does anyone know how to uninstall rubygem? I installed and it had the notorious hanging problem that no one seems to have an answer to. So I am going to attempt to install Rails without gems. Could someone point me in the right direction if you would not answer me? =) Regards, Edmund -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...n general isn't well tested. elf-dump is just too rudimentary and relies on simple (=dumb) binary contents dumps. The long-term solution for DWARF would be to enhance lib/DebugInfo to the point where it can handle all interesting DWARF sections. But this is a lofty goal, since DWARF parsing is notoriously hard and this would require a large investment of time and effort. And in the meantime, we just don't write good enough tests (and enough of them) for this very important feature. Therefore, as an interim stage, I propose to adopt some external tool that parses DWARF and emits decoded textua...

...(dkipping at qualcomm.com). >> >> If the group wants, I can do a form mail to existing registrations. > > I'd appreciate that just so I have an official record that I actually registered, instead of worrying every time I get another email about it. :) Same here. My brain is notoriously leaky about such things. -eric

...(http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/source/browse/trunk/src/common/dwarf/cfi_assembler.cc) > > The long-term solution for DWARF would be to enhance lib/DebugInfo to > the point where it can handle all interesting DWARF sections. But this > is a lofty goal, since DWARF parsing is notoriously hard and this > would require a large investment of time and effort. ????? Having written about 6 DWARF parsers, I strongly disagree it is either notoriously hard or a large investment of time and effort. People have written DWARF parsers on the weekend. One of the reasons DWARF is popular i...

Logs indicate everything's running correctly, my player says I'm connected, and the Web page for the server says it's playing files, but there's no audio. Strange. Any thoughts? Did I possibly convert the MP3's to Ogg Vorbis incorrectly?

...m.org] On Behalf Of Justin > Bogner via llvm-dev > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 11:44 > To: Jay Foad via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Fwd: bugpoint can't automatically select a safe > interpreter! > > Bugpoint's user interface is notoriously complex. I'm not sure why it's going > the safe interpreter route instead of reducing the crash, but I'd recommend > trying the custom scripts approach in this article for reducing something like > this: IIRC, bugpoint tries to initialize the execution environment (i.e., usi...

Hi all, i'm trying to figure out if i'm being silly or if there is a genuine problem. Running on the notorious Redhat 7, 2.2.16-22 #1, X86. [user at host]$ ssh-agent -s SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-XXYFcFR6/agent.2101; export SSH_AUTH_SOCK; SSH_AGENT_PID=2102; export SSH_AGENT_PID; echo Agent pid 2102; [user at host]$ echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK [user at host]$ echo $SSH_AGENT_PID [user at host]$ ssh-add Could not ope...

Dear List, creating factors in a given non-default orders is notoriously difficult to explain in a course. Students love the ifelse construct given below most, but I remember some comment from Martin M?chler (?) that ifelse should be banned from courses. Any better idea? Not necessarily short, easy to remember is important. Dieter data = c(1,7,10,50,70) levs = c(&...

Hello, what is the preferred way to do this... I have 2 controllers. Each has an index action. Now I want to include the rendered index view from TwoController in the index view of OneController. But a render :partial doesn''t execute the TwoController index action which sets variables for its index view. So maybe you can give me a short example how to do it. Thank you Markus

Hello all, I am experimenting with Speex in a mobile VoIP application, and it seems that it is worth stuffing more than one codec frame into a single RTP packet; mainly, that sending several frames per packet relieves the underlying network socket connection, which is notoriously problematic in mobile devices. RFC 5574 defines the exact way how to put multiple Speex frames into a single RTP packet, and how to extract them again. However, the frame boundaries are not on octet boundaries, and I am quite confused on how to actually format the RTP payload from multiple frame...

...generalities of GNU GPL may differ from R's specific GNU GPL license, and that I should refer specifically to it, and it should be on the CRAN website. I may be blind, but haven't seen such a document. Does one exist, and how may I obtain it? I believe they are wrong. Our legal team is notorious for being overly conservative, and I'm personally betting they think I won't look into it, and then they won't have to deal with it. But I will, and I want to use R. Thanks. PS Sorry if the document was posted and obvious, and I simply couldn't find it. Thanks. -- View this mes...

.... >>> >>> If the group wants, I can do a form mail to existing registrations. >> >> I'd appreciate that just so I have an official record that I actually registered, instead of worrying every time I get another email about it. :) > > Same here. My brain is notoriously leaky about such things. +1. Yes, please.

Hi there, I am a Chinese Wine user. Recently I am studying a notorious wine problem among Chinese community. The problem is that some Chinese application cannot display text correctly. There is a "dirty" patch submitted in the Ubuntu community, as it is dirty, people don't think the Wine team will accept it. I am trying to study this problem. My qu...

...rable debt to all the Developers. It's not much, it's sometimes misguided (I later discover), and my resources are severely limited, but I do try. I hope not to be seen as an enemy. So, if you can explain to me what was wrong about my tongue in cheek criticism of R's relying on my notoriously unreliable OS, in notoriously unreliable circumstances, I will indeed publicly apologise. > -----Original Message----- > From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk] <snip> > I believe Simon Fear owes the R-developers a public apology > for his (not > properly re...

...@ll, LLVM-7.0.0-win32.exe contains and installs lib\clang\7.0.0\lib\windows\clang_rt.builtins-i386.lib The implementation of (at least) the multiplication and division routines __[u]{div,mod,divmod,mul}[sdt]i[34] shipped with this libraries SUCKS: they are factors SLOWER than even Microsoft's NOTORIOUS POOR implementation of 64-bit division shipped with MSVC and Windows! The reasons: 1. subroutine matroschka, 2. "C" implementation! JFTR: the target processor "i386" (introduced October 1985) is a 32-bit processor, it has instructions to divide 64-bit integers by 3...

...opened the console and loaded the file into a string and did a regex search for my data -- the result was almost instantaneous. The question is, if I can get away with it, am I better off just going the regex route, or is it really worth my while to investigate a faster XML parser (I know REXML is notorious for being slow, but given how fast it was to call a regex on the file, I am thinking that this will still be faster than all parsers). Any comments or suggestions appreciated. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" grou...