Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "notmerg".
Did you mean:
nother
2008 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] merging globals
Hi Chris,
> > Wouldn't it be slightly cleaner to mark the distinct objects in the
> > LLVM intermediate representation?
> That is what I'm suggesting. Each llvm IR global variable would have
> its own flag.
I think the suggestion is to have a "notmergable" flag instead of a
"mergeable" flag. In practice, it doesn't really matter, but I guess you'll
see the difference in the IR. I agree here that it would be more logical to
have a notmergable (or "distinct" ?) flag, instead of a mergeable flag, though
it's not...
2008 Oct 17
2
[LLVMdev] merging globals
On 17/10/2008, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Please no flag. If we want to fix this problem, lets do it right. To
> me this consists of some flag on GlobalVariable that says that it is
> 'mergable' or something like that.
Wouldn't it be slightly cleaner to mark the distinct objects in the
LLVM intermediate representation? This would make the default
2008 Oct 17
0
[LLVMdev] merging globals
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:18 AM, danchr at gmail.com wrote:
> On 17/10/2008, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> Please no flag. If we want to fix this problem, lets do it right.
>> To
>> me this consists of some flag on GlobalVariable that says that it is
>> 'mergable' or something like that.
>
> Wouldn't it be slightly cleaner to