search for: notimp

...10.0.0.20 Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION: gc._msdcs.schau.local. 900 IN A 10.0.0.20 ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure update failed: NOTIMP Failed nsupdate: 2 Calling nsupdate for CNAME e22551f7-0de8-4773-a526-435b44971594._msdcs.schau.local tuxsrv.schau.local Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION: e22551f7...

The primary (a BIND9) of a zone ("test.") served (as a secondary) by our nsd complains: Jul 16 17:52:45.796 notify: debug 3: zone test/IN: notify response from 192.134.7.251#53: NOTIMP After all, nsd implements the NOTIFY, it logs them and SEC parses the log file to run "nsdc update". Isn't it an error to send a NOTIMP? nsd 1.2.1

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind After #437891, I got yet another new "unexpected RCODE", this time "NOTIMP". As I was starting to get pissed off, I copied the whole list out of lib/dns/result.c, in an attempt to put an end to my headache. If you insist on using an enumeration instead of ".*", here's the complete list (aside from NOERROR, obviously): ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:...

...== [mbt at aloe ~]$ dig -t MX nautest.naunetcorp.com @s4.nautest.naunetcorp.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.2-P1-RedHat-9.9.2-5.P1.fc18 <<>> -t MX nautest.naunetcorp.com @s4.nautest.naunetcorp.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOTIMP, id: 5782 ;; flags: qr rd ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;nautest.naunetcorp.com. IN MX ;; Query time: 2 msec ;; SERVER: 2001:470:c0a7:6::2#53(...

...box( From another box same result ) [root at dcmsc caiman]# dig @127.0.0.1 mx test.inc ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.6 <<>> @127.0.0.1 mx test.inc ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOTIMP, id: 62639 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;test.inc. IN MX ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Sat May 4 21:12:29 2013 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd:...

...4-dc samba[689]: /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: [2019/08/02 15:35:42.272708, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:316(samba_runcmd_io_handler) ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: update failed: NOTIMP ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: [2019/08/02 15:35:42.305040, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:290(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:290: Failed DNS update - with error code 2 ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc smbd[680]: [2019/08/02 1...

...unreachable) resolving 'software.majix.org/A/IN': 2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53 I believe that this line was intended to match it. ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[[:digit:]]+\]: ((network|host) (unreachable|down)|connection refused|unexpected RCODE \((FORMERR|SERVFAIL|NXDOMAIN|NOTIMP|REFUSED|YXDOMAIN|YXRRSET|NXRRSET|NOTAUTH|NOTZONE|BADVERS|<rcode [[:digit:]]+>|[[:digit:]]+)\)) resolving '[^[:space:]]+': [.:[:xdigit:]]+#[[:digit:]]+$ The Lenny form of the syslog line would have been: May 17 07:39:43 localhost named[2395]: network unreachable resolving '38.1...

...bin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG > error with server: tsig verify failure > ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: [2019/08/02 15:35:42.272708, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:316(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: update > failed: NOTIMP > ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: [2019/08/02 15:35:42.305040, 0] > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:290(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) > ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc samba[689]: > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:290: Failed DNS update - with error code 2 > ago 02 15:35:42 samba4-dc...

I tried to compile Samba 2.0 beta with cc under SCO 3.2. I seem to be missing the inet.h and netdb.h include files. Does anyone know if they are publicly available? Steve Grose Sgrose@cmps.com Continental Managed Pharmacy Services - www.preferrx.com Voice - 216-459-2025 Ext. 208 Fax - 216-485-8615 Any opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employers.