Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "note_insn_epilogue_beg".
2009 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...ay 30 00:33:46 2009
New Revision: 147995
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147995
Log:
* cfgcleanup.c (try_crossjump_to_edge): Only skip past
NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK.
* cfglayout.c (duplicate_insn_chain): Copy epilogue insn marks.
Duplicate NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG notes.
* cfgrtl.c (can_delete_note_p): Allow NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG
to be deleted.
* dwarf2out.c (struct cfa_loc): Change indirect field to bitfield,
add in_use field.
(add_cfi): Disable check redefining cfa away from drap.
(lookup_cfa_1): Add remembe...
2009 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/
>> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.
>> 10.5.dylib?
>> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the
>> latter, then
>> if you
2009 Sep 18
4
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/
> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.10.5.dylib?
> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the latter, then
> if you changed the FSF build of libgcc_s for darwin to have the right
> magic symbols, then