search for: notauth

...odel [2015/04/22 13:50:41.245892,? 0] ../lib/util/become_daemon.c:124(daemon_ready) ? STATUS=daemon 'samba' finished starting up and ready to serve connections [2015/04/22 13:50:42.410197,? 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:324(samba_runcmd_io_handler) ? /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: update failed: NOTAUTH [2015/04/22 13:50:42.453299,? 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:324(samba_runcmd_io_handler) ? /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: update failed: NOTAUTH [2015/04/22 13:50:42.498516,? 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:324(samba_runcmd_io_handler) ? running : samba_dnsupdate --verbose ? update failed: NOTAUTH Failed...

...isting samba 4 DC, > both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version > 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. > > The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its > local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in > "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. > > Both systems are set up identically except for the > provisioning/joining command. On the first I did > samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain > --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ \ > --realm=$realm --adminpas...

...isting samba 4 DC, > both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version > 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. > > The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its > local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in > "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. > > Both systems are set up identically except for the > provisioning/joining command. On the first I did > samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain > --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ \ > --realm=$realm --adminpas...

...a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. Both systems are set up identically except for the provisioning/joining command. On the first I did samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ \ --realm=$realm --adminpass=Wonttell and on the second...

Im suggesting, Since the following: NOTAUTH : is a failure on dns updates is OR incorrect manual changes in bind and/or incorrect rights. And check the needed rights on what the dns needs. I dont know if your using bind or internal dns. For bind : look here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD And...

..._DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >>> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >>> >>> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>> local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results >>> in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. >>> >>> Both systems are set up identically except for the >>> provisioning/joining command. On the first I did >>> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain >>> --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIN...

...es) > appear every 10 minutes on my CentOS BDC: > > Feb 22 07:38:12 storage samba[27405]: [2016/02/22 07:38:12.057697, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:328(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > Feb 22 07:38:12 storage samba[27405]: > /usr/local/samba-4.3.4/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: update failed: NOTAUTH > > I have no idea what this error means. As I followed almost "by > default" settings in the setup procedure I might suspect there's > something missing that needs to be fixed or improved in my settings. > The only suspicious stuff I noticed is that these 2 Samba serve...

...> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >> local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in >> "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. >> >> Both systems are set up identically except for the >> provisioning/joining command. On the first I did >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain >> --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ \ >> -...

...ng log messages (repeated times) appear every 10 minutes on my CentOS BDC: Feb 22 07:38:12 storage samba[27405]: [2016/02/22 07:38:12.057697, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:328(samba_runcmd_io_handler) Feb 22 07:38:12 storage samba[27405]: /usr/local/samba-4.3.4/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: update failed: NOTAUTH I have no idea what this error means. As I followed almost "by default" settings in the setup procedure I might suspect there's something missing that needs to be fixed or improved in my settings. The only suspicious stuff I noticed is that these 2 Samba servers have a couple of minu...

..._DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >>> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >>> >>> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>> local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results >>> in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. >>> >>> Both systems are set up identically except for the >>> provisioning/joining command. On the first I did >>> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain >>> --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIN...

Hello Rowland, thanks for your help. My replies lines below: > Do the DCs point at each other for dns ? > > i.e. is /etc/resolv.conf on the first DC something like this: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.second.dc > nameserver ip.of.this.dc > > and on the second DC: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.first.dc > nameserver

...version >>>>> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >>>>> >>>>> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>>>> local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results >>>>> in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. >>>>> >>>>> Both systems are set up identically except for the >>>>> provisioning/joining command. On the first I did >>>>> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain >>>&gt...

...> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >> local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in >> "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. >> >> Both systems are set up identically except for the >> provisioning/joining command. On the first I did >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain >> --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ \ >> -...

...to put an end to my headache. If you insist on using an enumeration instead of ".*", here's the complete list (aside from NOERROR, obviously): ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: unexpected RCODE \((FORMERR|SERVFAIL|NXDOMAIN|NOTIMP|REFUSED|YXDOMAIN|YXRRSET|NXRRSET|NOTAUTH|NOTZONE|BADVERS|<rcode [[:digit:]]+>|[[:digit:]]+)\) resolving '[^[:space:]]+': [.[:digit:]]+#[0-9]+$ (Remember that this is both a violations and a normal ignore rule.) The source sets undefined rcodes such as 15 as "<rcode 15>", but they show up as merely "15&...

...om 8c:be:be:0d:cf:3c (RedmiNote4-Gj?gur) via 192.168.52.253 Dec 18 15:39:44 dc02 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.52.232 to 8c:be:be:0d:cf:3c (RedmiNote4-Gj?gur) via 192.168.52.253 Dec 18 15:39:46 dc02 dhcpd: domain is rvx.is Dec 18 15:39:46 dc02 dhcpd: doing add Dec 18 15:39:46 dc02 dhcpd: update failed: NOTAUTH Dec 18 15:39:47 dc02 dhcpd: update failed: NOTAUTH Dec 18 15:39:47 dc02 logger: DHCP-DNS Update failed: 22 In this state, clearing the /tmp/dhcpd-dyndns.cc and/or regeneraing the /etc/dhcpduser.keytab will not fix things. Only restarting the "named" server does, after which I get stuff...

Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH

...dhcpd[318]: execute_statement argv[3] = 1:a0:ce:c8:e:35:7c Dec 18 14:45:28 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: execute_statement argv[4] = Dadis-MBP Dec 18 14:45:29 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: domain is rvx.is Dec 18 14:45:29 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: doing add Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is logger[15729]: DHCP-DNS Update failed: 22 Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: execute: /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh exit status 5632 Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.62.107...

...rsion 4.4.5, bind is version >>>> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >>>> >>>> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>>> local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results >>>> in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. >>>> >>>> Both systems are set up identically except for the >>>> provisioning/joining command. On the first I did >>>> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=$domain >>>> --server-role=...

...ng nsupdate for A addc.domain2.domain1.tld 192.168.237.21 (add) Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION: addc.domain2.domain1.tld. 900 IN A 192.168.237.21 update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2 I’ve googled the NOTAUTH errors but cannot find anything particular to my system which may be the cause, I’ve gone back and verified all my configuration information is seemingly correct per the wiki pages, checked permissions on needed .keytab and .conf files, checked logs for...

...Dec 18 14:45:28 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: execute_statement argv[4] > > > = Dadis-MBP > > > Dec 18 14:45:29 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: domain is rvx.is > > > Dec 18 14:45:29 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: doing add > > > Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH > > > Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH > > > Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is logger[15729]: DHCP-DNS Update > > > failed: 22 Dec 18 14:45:30 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: execute: > > > /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh exit status 5632 > >...