Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "not_tail_called".
2015 Nov 04
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...atch and he
thinks it's OK now.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
Do you have further comments on the llvm-side patch or the semantics of the
function attribute? Since the last time we discussed on the list, I've made
changes to disallow virtual functions and objective-c methods to be marked
not_tail_called, which further reduces unpredictability due to optimization.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 09/29/2015 11:38 AM, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipream...
2015 Sep 29
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2015 10:38 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote:
>
>>
>> > That was what I had in mind: the function attribute blocks tail call
>> for statically direct calls but doesn't promise
>> > anything (in fact, does nothing) for indirect calls.
>> >
>>