Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "nosideeffect".
Did you mean:
nosideeffects
2012 Aug 19
2
[LLVMdev] isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute() for CallInst
...than isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute().
If you think the attribute is a good idea, name suggestions for it are also welcome: "pure" and "const" are already used in gcc in a slightly different meaning (equivalent to LLVM "readonly" and "readnone", I think), "nosideeffects" risks confusion with mayHaveSideEffects(), and anything that has the word "speculatively" in it is probably too long.
Thanks,
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain con...