search for: northbridges

Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE

Seems like overnight every motherboard that worked with linux has DROPPED off the face of the earth. Every motherboard I looked at is using the realtek 8111 chipset and a northbridge that is not supported. Example: GIGABYTE GA-970A-DS3, does not work with linux I tried disabling the onboard NIC and using a PCI-E intel card I always use and that would not work either. The north or south bridge

Hello all..... I would like to know if anyone here has had good experience with this Supermicro motherboard.....http://supermicro.com/products/motherboard/P4/E7221/P8SCT.cfm I am thinking about using it in an entry level mail and file server with a 3ware card and 200 GB SATA drives. Cost is a factor here otherwise I would go for an Opteron board instead. JC

Hello, since applying the patches related to XSA-36 Xen recognizes a broken IVRS ACPI table and disables I/O virtualisation. I contacted the manufacturer of the mainboard/BIOS and they want to help me by providing a patched BIOS - so far so good. However, they need details about what to fix, which I don''t know either. Could you pls. give me some hints which I can forward to the

Dear mailinglist, I own a Gigabyte motherboard GA 970A UD3 with IOMMU support. Since the update XSA-36 (also part of the latest debian wheezy pkg), the IO-Virtualisation does not work any more as discussed on this mailinglist [0] and [1]. I like to ask, if there is an "official" solution in sight. I''m not sure about my alternatives. How "dangerous" is the

Hi all, i have a question. I''m going to setup a Xen server for a client. It''s going to serve about 25 clients. It''s a Athlon 64 3200+, which currently runs Debian i386-stable and xen 2.0.7 until Xen 3.0 is stable enough, and then i''m gonna replace it with Debian amd64-stable and Xen 3.0. The Xen dom''s consists of: Samba , file printer sharing most

> I got a response back from 3ware, as I forwarded Ian''s note to them... > My card(s) is(are) an 8506-4LP I''m not sure about the newer controllers, but the older generation certainly couldn''t do DMA above 4GB, and relied on bounce buffers or GART support. To try and recreate your setup we put an old 3ware controller in a machine with 6GB and have been hitting it

Hello, I'm facing issues with a Point of View GT210/218 and nouveau drivers. I'm using ubuntu server with LXDE on top of it... *lshw -c video* output: *-display description: VGA compatible controller product: GT218 [GeForce 210] vendor: NVIDIA Corporation physical id: 0 bus info: pci at 0000:01:00.0 version: a2 width: 64 bits clock:

Hi, I have noticed that the Intel VT-d patch has merged into unstable source tree. My question is how to use the PCI pass-through feature? The Intel Q35 express northbridge chipset (with VT-d) motherboard is out. I am eager to try it out. Thanks! HY _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hey, folks, I've just started seeing Apr 12 13:09:59 <server> kernel: [Hardware Error]: MC4_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|-|Poison|CECC]: 0xdd0accf2001d011b Apr 12 13:09:59 <server> kernel: [Hardware Error]: Northbridge Error (node 1, core 1): ECC error in L3 cache tag. Apr 12 13:09:59 <server> kernel: [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD Apr 12 13:09:59

I know most of the motherboards based off of the Intel Q35 northbridge usually have VT-d options for it to be enabled or disabled in the BIOS.  I''ve heard the same for Intel 5400''s and Intel 3200/3210''s but been looking through manuals for various server boards and don''t see VT-d options in the BIOS. However, I was wondering if anyone had success stories or

...till needs to consider effects // of P-state changes on TSC return TRUE; } else { return FALSE; } } C1_ramp_8gen() { // Check if C1-Clock ramping enabled in PMM7.CpuLowPwrEnh // On 8th-Generation cores only. Assume BIOS has setup // all Northbridges equivalently. return (1 & read_pci_byte(bus=0,dev=0x18,fcn=3,offset=0x87)); } When an operating system can not avoid using TSC in the short-term, the operating system will need to either re-synchronize the TSC of the halted core when exiting halt or disable C1-clock ram...

On 28/07/2015 18:42, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On the other hand interrupt remapping is absolutely necessary for > > production use, hence my point that x86 does not promise API stability. > > Well, we currently implement the features that the Q35 used to expose. > Adding interrupt remapping will require a new chipset and/or a hack > switch to ignore compatibility. Isn't

On 28/07/2015 18:42, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On the other hand interrupt remapping is absolutely necessary for > > production use, hence my point that x86 does not promise API stability. > > Well, we currently implement the features that the Q35 used to expose. > Adding interrupt remapping will require a new chipset and/or a hack > switch to ignore compatibility. Isn't

I'm running CentOS 5.1 with all updates, and the xen kernel. For some reason the OS is not seeing the full amount of ram. #uname -a Linux CentOS-VM-A 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5xen #1 SMP Tue May 20 10:03:27 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 6104064 3445136 2658928 0 1412236

I recently added a Seagate 400Gb SATA drive to my system, and it has been behaving strangely since I put it in. for one thing, the BIOS S.M.A.R.T. came up with a warning the last time I booted with it enabled, saying that I should backup my data and replace the disk (!). I still have not made any irreversible data transfers to this drive, and I have some time yet to take it back, but I'd

Hi, We're having some trouble with detection of a couple of Sil3124 SATA controller cards on newer motherboard and processor combos. Specifically, we're running a Supermicro X9SCM-F motherboard (latest BIOS) and Intel E3-1220v2 CPU. What we're seeing: - Syba Sil3124 PCIe cards are only being detected when installed in PCIe Slot 4 -- The motherboard documentation shows that this

Hi, This is updated xen vMCE design foils, according to comments from community recently. This foils focus on vMCE part of Xen MCA, so as Keir said, it''s some dense. Later Will will present a document to elaborate more, including Intel MCA and surrounding features and Xen implementation. Thanks, Jinsong

Hello, every few hours I get the following message in /var/log/message: Jul 5 20:23:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 20:53:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 22:13:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 23:53:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 23:58:27 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 6 01:38:27 hXXX kernel: Machine

On 2015-07-28 19:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 28/07/2015 18:42, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On the other hand interrupt remapping is absolutely necessary for >>> production use, hence my point that x86 does not promise API stability. >> >> Well, we currently implement the features that the Q35 used to expose. >> Adding interrupt remapping will require