Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "normalcy".
Did you mean:
normal_y
2005 Sep 21
1
Speex and Builder
...or fair comparisons?
2) In particular, how is the jitter buffer control for Speex in response to
intermitent poor connection hiccups? Is it robust enough to smooth out lost
packets (error concealment) and quick enough to recover the live
conversation smoothly once the packets received are back to normalcy?
3) Has anyone used Speex for live VoIP application? Any good references or
examples to start with?
4) Since we are focusing on the user application development, may I know
what is the highest-level API for Speex that a developer can use such that
all lower-level issues related to buffering, er...
2005 Sep 20
2
Speex and Builder
> Obviously this is Jean-Marc's decision and I'm not telling
> him not to support this compiler. I am however pointing
> out that this compiler is yet more work for very little
> payoff. In the case of my project, the proponent of C++
> Builder sent me a huge, monsterously ugly and totally
> unmaintainable patch to add C++ Builder support. Needless
> to say, that
2005 Sep 21
0
Speex and Builder
...> 2) In particular, how is the jitter buffer control for Speex in response to
> intermitent poor connection hiccups? Is it robust enough to smooth out lost
> packets (error concealment) and quick enough to recover the live
> conversation smoothly once the packets received are back to normalcy?
There is packet loss concealment in Speex even without using the jitter
buffer (no, error concealment wasn't invented by GIPS). As for the
jitter buffer itself, it's adaptive, so it just keeps the lowest
possible delay that doesn't cause losses.
> 3) Has anyone used Speex for live...
2005 Sep 21
2
Speex and Builder
...how is the jitter buffer control for Speex in response
> to
> > intermitent poor connection hiccups? Is it robust enough to smooth out
> lost
> > packets (error concealment) and quick enough to recover the live
> > conversation smoothly once the packets received are back to normalcy?
>
> There is packet loss concealment in Speex even without using the jitter
> buffer (no, error concealment wasn't invented by GIPS). As for the
> jitter buffer itself, it's adaptive, so it just keeps the lowest
> possible delay that doesn't cause losses.
>
> >...
2006 Sep 14
10
scriptaculous Toggle Appear rate
I have the following code to toggle a basic appear of a div:
<a href="#" onclick="Effect.toggle(''d3'',''appear''); return
false;">Toggle appear</a>
I want to edit the rate in which the effect runs. I can''t for the life
of me figure it out. I would like to make the effect complete faster,
like .5 seconds. I''ve